Pesticide Resistance in Stored-Product Insects and Alternative Biorational Management: A Brief Review

Talukder, F. A.

doi:10.24200/jams.vol14iss0pp9-15

Cited by 20 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(2017) ; Elango et al., 2016 ; Andy and Edema, 2019 2.6 Chemical control carbamates, organophosphates, organochlorines, and pyrethroids. Lethal action Developing stages and adults Talukder (2009) ; Parmar and Patel (2016) 2.7 Microbial control Microorganism Lethal Action Developing stages Phillips and Throne (2009) ; Kavallieratos et al. (2012a) , b ; Gahukar (2014) 2.8 Transgenic approach Alteration of DNA, Genetic maping arcelins, phyto-hemagglutinins and α -amylase as bruchid inhibitors Larva Collins et al.…”

Section: Modern Pest Management Approaches ( Table 2 )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review

Kalpna

Hajam

Kumar

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bruchids are most pernicious pest of stored grain pulses, especially in the tropical and subtropical areas. They penetrate into the fully grown matured pods, grains in fields and also during post-harvest storage. Among bruchids, Callosobruchus maculatus is the prominent pest having ubiquitous distribution. Chemical/synthetic insecticides provides adequate control against the C. maculatus on the pulses. However, the use of synthetic insecticides induces adverse health outcomes in agricultural workers and many causes various diseases such as cancers, genomic damage, oxidative stress, neurological disorders and respiratory, metabolic and thyroid effects. Therefore, alternative effective, safe and sustainable pest control, integration of different compatible methods should be taken into considerations. One of the possible managements might be use of traditional as well modern pest management practices. Traditional techniques include sealed containers, inert materials, harvesting time, alternate host, intercropping, storing un-threshed pulses, cleanliness, vegetable oil etc. Modern techniques such as temperature, freezing and heating, radiation treatments, resistance varieties, natural control, botanical extracts, chemical and microbial, transgenic approach, cold plasma treatments etc. thus integrated pest management might be alternative approach to combat the effect of pest. Therefore, present review aims to considers various measures for the handling of bruchids with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus and integrated molecular inventions to decrease bruchids populations and enhance pulse productivity in pulses.

show abstract

Section: Modern Pest Management Approaches ( Table 2 )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review

Kalpna

Hajam

Kumar

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many researchers have also reported the effectiveness of chemical pesticides including dusts, fumigants and sprays for the prevention of bruchid pests (Harberd, ). However, the bruchids showed resistance to many traditional pesticides such as permethrin, lindane, pirimiphos‐methyl, phostoxin, methyl bromide and iodofenphos (Evans, ; Egwuatua, ; Talukder, ), and their application at higher doses leads to the accumulation of toxic residues in the treated products. Furthermore, problems associated with chemical pesticides especially pesticide resistance, health hazards and environmental effects, have created a worldwide interest in the development of alternative approaches, such as exploitation of available host plant resistance through the tools of biotechnology and breeding for bruchid pest management in pulse crops.…”

Section: Conventional Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bruchid pest management in pulses: past practices, present status and use of modern breeding tools for development of resistant varieties

Mishra

Macedo

Panda

et al. 2017

Annals of Applied Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bruchids (Callosobruchus spp.) are recognised as the most detrimental storage pest of pulses, especially in the tropics and subtropics. They invade matured pods as well as seeds during storage and, to some extent, farming fields, in turn reducing the net yield of the crops. Several approaches including cultural, biological, physical and chemical control measures have been implemented with the aim of managing these pests, but none of these have been successful across time and space. Recently, transgenic-and marker-assisted breeding approaches have appeared as promising tools for the successful management of these pests. Although some efforts have been made on the development of bruchid-resistant transgenic crops, the cultivars developed are yet to be commercialised worldwide because of various limitations. In contrast, marker-assisted breeding involving the identification of DNA-based markers linked to host resistance against bruchids, have shown some success in the quest for the development of bruchid-resistant cultivar(s). DNA markers linked to bruchid resistance have been identified in various grain legumes, particularly in the genus Vigna, and include mung bean (Vigna radiata), azuki bean (Vigna angularis), rice bean (Vigna umbellata), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and black gram (Vigna mungo). After their validation in different genetic backgrounds, these markers could be utilised for marker-assisted selection and breeding ventures to protect pulse crops. The present study discusses the pros and cons of different approaches for the successful management of the bruchid pests in pulses. The review also highlights about the integrative approach aided with molecular interventions to improve productivity by avoiding losses incurred due to bruchids, and to attain sustainable yields for major pulse crops.

show abstract

“…Control of these insects relies heavily on the use of gaseous synthetic insecticides and fumigants, which has led to some problems, such as ozone depletion, pest resurgence, pest resistance to insecticides and lethal effects on non-target organisms in addition to direct toxicity to users (Pimentel et al, 2008;Talukder, 2009;Boyer et al, 2012). Therefore, much effort has been focused on alternative control materials for potentially useful products as commercial insectcontrol agents.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Yerli entomopatojenik fungus izolatları ile üç ticari entomopatojenik fungus ürününün Sitophilus oryzae L. ve Tribolium confusum du Val üzerindeki etkinlikleri

Baki¹,

Tosun

Erler

2021

Harran Tarım Ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present study, a total of 17 indigenous entomopathogenic fungal (EPF) isolates (Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill.-14, Clonostachys rosea (Link) Schroers-2, Isaria farinosa (Holmsk.) Fr.-1) obtained from soil samples collected from Antalya province (southwestern part of Turkey) and three commercial EPF products [i.e. Priority ® (Paecilomyces fumosoroseus), Nibortem ® (Verticillium lecanii) and Nostalgist ® (Beauveria bassiana)] were evaluated for their efficacy against the 7-10-day-old adults of Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium confusum du Val. (Col.: Tenebrionidae) under laboratory conditions. All the isolates and products were tested at 1 × 10 7 conidia/ml suspensions against the both insect species. The results from the single-dose pathogenicity assays showed that three B. bassiana isolates (BbDm-1, BbKp-1 and BbMp-1) caused mortalities 96.7%, 100% and 93.3% in S. oryzae, and 100%, 100% and 96.7% in T. confusum, respectively, 14 days after inoculation whereas all three commercial products achieved mortalities ranging from 56.7% and 63.3% in S. oryzae and from 56.7% and 66.7% in T. confusum. In addition, the results from molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the ITS region sequence indicated that the three effective B. bassiana isolates (BbDm-1, BbKp-1 and BbMp-1) showed a high similarity (99%) with other B. bassiana isolates in GenBank. Overall results suggest that these three B. bassiana isolates have potential for management of S. oryzae and T. confusum.

show abstract

Pesticide Resistance in Stored-Product Insects and Alternative Biorational Management: A Brief Review

Cited by 20 publications

References 37 publications

Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review

Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review

Bruchid pest management in pulses: past practices, present status and use of modern breeding tools for development of resistant varieties

Yerli entomopatojenik fungus izolatları ile üç ticari entomopatojenik fungus ürününün Sitophilus oryzae L. ve Tribolium confusum du Val üzerindeki etkinlikleri

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About