1969
DOI: 10.1093/jee/62.4.840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pesticide Drift. I. High-Clearance vs. Aerial Application of Sprays1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 9, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.07.463581 doi: bioRxiv preprint higher than that produced by ground sprayers (Ware et al 1969). This might be because aerial fumigation has heightened effects on small streams and ponds, as they are hard to avoid when crops and wetlands share a common boundary (Hill 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 9, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.07.463581 doi: bioRxiv preprint higher than that produced by ground sprayers (Ware et al 1969). This might be because aerial fumigation has heightened effects on small streams and ponds, as they are hard to avoid when crops and wetlands share a common boundary (Hill 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale of this agricultural runoff can be large in the GoM, because fertilization and application of pesticides are not only carried out with ground sprayers, but also from airplanes. Wetlands are known to be routinely contaminated by pesticides and fertilizers on adjacent agricultural areas (Alho and Vieira 1997;Donald et al 1999;Hill 2003;Hernández-Romero et al 2004), however the downwind drift from the aerial application has been estimated to be more than four times higher than that produced by ground sprayers (Ware et al 1969). This might be because aerial fumigation has heightened effects on small streams and ponds, as they are hard to avoid when crops and wetlands share a common boundary (Hill 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the drifting spray is largely composed of droplets with a diameter lower than 100 µm [42], other methodologies must be employed to assess smaller dimensions. As reported in the literature, a good option is the cascade impactor [42][43][44][45][46]. This instrument is an active aerosol sampler composed of (1) an inlet, which samples all the particles of the aerosol, (2) several sequential stages that collect specific decreasing dimensional classes by inertial impact on surfaces, and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O custo das análises, a disponibilidade de equipamento analítico e a precisão desejada para os resultados representam fatores importantes na escolha de um determinado traçador para realização dos ensaios. Alguns pesquisadores têm utilizado como traçador os próprios inseticidas (Ware et al, 1969a(Ware et al, , 1969bWare et al, 1970aWare et al, , 1970b, partículas fluorescentes como ZnCaS (Murray & Vaughan, 1970), agrotóxicos marcados (Maybank et al, 1974), radioisótopos (Dobson et al, 1983), corantes fluorescentes (Liljedahl & Strait, 1959;Yates & Akesson, 1963;Fox et al, 1990;Salyani & Cromwell, 1992) e corantes de alimentos (Pergher et al, 1997). Quantick (1985) cita os principais métodos para análise de recuperação de químicos em experimentos relacionados às téc-nicas de aplicação.…”
unclassified