Peste des Petits Ruminants

Diallo, Adama; Bataillé, Arnaud; Lancelot, Renaud; Libeau, Geneviève

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25385-1_12

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 151 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the peracute form, with general signs of major infections and mostly observed in naïve young animals, the course of the disease is shorter and more severe and the animal progresses to sudden death (100% case fatality in 5–6 days), while in the subacute form, fever and other symptoms are less pronounced, sometimes limited to ocular and nasal discharge. Asymptomatic form can be observed in endemic areas, especially in sheep (FAO, 1999; Diallo, 2003; CFSPH, 2015; Charbonnier et al., 2015; EFSA AHAW Panel, 2015; OIE, 2020).…”

Section: Disease Characterisation and Geographical Distribution Of Pprmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: peste des petits ruminants

Nielsen¹,

Álvarez²,

Bicout³

et al. 2021

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for peste des petits ruminants (PPR). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective, except for the first affected establishments detected, where 33 days is recommended. It was concluded that beyond the protection (3 km) and the surveillance zones (10 km) only 9.6% (95% CI: 3.1-25.8%) and 2.3% (95% CI: 1-5.5%) of the infections from an affected establishment may occur, respectively. This may be considered sufficient to contain the disease spread (95% probability of containing transmission corresponds to 5.3 km). Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad-hoc requests in relation to PPR.

show abstract

Section: Disease Characterisation and Geographical Distribution Of Pprmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: peste des petits ruminants

Nielsen¹,

Álvarez²,

Bicout³

et al. 2021

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The FAO/OIE PPR global control and eradication strategy (PPR GCES) needs a huge financial commitment ( 12 ), capacity building and technical support, but also well-funded ad-hoc interdisciplinary research that addresses important knowledge gaps for eradication, and effective scientific networks through the Global Research and Expertise Network PPR GREN 1 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial: Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR): Generating Evidence to Support Eradication Efforts

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite