2020
DOI: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.en-1781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pest survey card on non‐European Monochamus spp.

Abstract: This pest survey card was prepared in the context of the EFSA mandate on plant pest surveillance (M‐2017‐0137) at the request of the European Commission. The purpose of the document is to assist the Member States to plan annual survey activities of quarantine organisms using a statistically sound and risk‐based pest survey approach, in line with current international standards. The data requirements for such an activity include the pest distribution, its host range, its biology and risk factors, as well as ava… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with the aforementioned drivers, the proximity to urban areas and roads seems to be another driving force influencing the number of detections in the grid. The presence of sawmills and wood depots was also an important factor, as recognized by previous studies [77]. Around all such facilities identified in the study region, a high density of declining trees (not exclusively caused by PWN infections; see the lower image of Figure 8, for an example) were found both in the field surveys and commercial satellite imagery.…”
Section: Spatial Analysissupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Together with the aforementioned drivers, the proximity to urban areas and roads seems to be another driving force influencing the number of detections in the grid. The presence of sawmills and wood depots was also an important factor, as recognized by previous studies [77]. Around all such facilities identified in the study region, a high density of declining trees (not exclusively caused by PWN infections; see the lower image of Figure 8, for an example) were found both in the field surveys and commercial satellite imagery.…”
Section: Spatial Analysissupporting
confidence: 63%