2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pest damage in mixed forests: Disentangling the effects of neighbor identity, host density and host apparency at different spatial scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While reduced individual tree damage is probably strongest at the scale of neighbouring trees, for example due to reduced host apparency (Guyot et al 2015;Damien et al 2016), improvement of forest health can be achieved at the stand scale (Guyot et al 2016). Improved effectiveness of biological control by natural enemies may also provide benefits to adjacent land uses such as agricultural crops (Veres et al 2013).…”
Section: Effects Of Forest Tree Diversity On Pest Regulation Of Nativmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While reduced individual tree damage is probably strongest at the scale of neighbouring trees, for example due to reduced host apparency (Guyot et al 2015;Damien et al 2016), improvement of forest health can be achieved at the stand scale (Guyot et al 2016). Improved effectiveness of biological control by natural enemies may also provide benefits to adjacent land uses such as agricultural crops (Veres et al 2013).…”
Section: Effects Of Forest Tree Diversity On Pest Regulation Of Nativmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand mixed-forest dynamics are triggered by differences in tree species-specific growth rates, which may lead to changes in host apparency (e.g., Damien et al 2016) and perhaps host palatability. These factors may change the magnitude and direction of effects on pest insects in the forestry cycle.…”
Section: Effects Of Forest Tree Diversity On Pest Regulation Of Nativmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing dilution between non-host trees is an important driver of AR (Hambäck and Beckerman 2003;Jactel et al 2006;Damien et al 2016). This dilution effect on ACGW infestation rates could be explained by heterospecific neighbours acting as physical (Castagneyrol et al 2014b;Damien et al 2016) or chemical barriers (Tahvanainen and Root 1972;Randlkofer et al 2010;Jactel et al 2011) to chestnut localisation by ACGW (see also Germinara et al 2011). Blight symptoms in interaction with chestnut apparency modifies ACGW infestations…”
Section: Acgw Infestation Rates Depend On Tree Neighbour Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…its apparency (Strauss et al 2015), has been described as a key mechanism driving AR (Castagneyrol et al 2013). Both visual (Dulaurent et al 2012;Damien et al 2016) and chemical (Zhang and Schlyter 2004;Jactel et al 2011) cues used by insect herbivores to locate and colonize a host tree can be disrupted by the presence of heterospecific neighbours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…well identified herbivore species (e.g.,Plath, Dorn, Riedel, Barriois, & Mody, 2012;Damien et al, 2016;Muiruri & Koricheva, 2016). On the contrary, when herbivory is assessed at the level of the herbivore community (e.g., total damage with no identification of responsible herbivore species), overall response to tree diversity might be blurred by opposite responses of different herbivore species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%