2017
DOI: 10.3368/le.93.2.230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PES Impact and Leakages over Several Cohorts: The Case of the PSA-H in Yucatan, Mexico

Abstract: Études et Documents is a working papers series. Working Papers are not refereed, they constitute research in progress. Responsibility for the contents and opinions expressed in the working papers rests solely with the authors. Comments and suggestions are welcome and should be addressed to the authors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our case study suggests that payments alone are insufficient to attract enough participation by Chilean fishers to scale the program and deliver significant environmental benefits. Similarly, payments alone are unlikely to sustain renewed participation in PES programs over time [ 42 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our case study suggests that payments alone are insufficient to attract enough participation by Chilean fishers to scale the program and deliver significant environmental benefits. Similarly, payments alone are unlikely to sustain renewed participation in PES programs over time [ 42 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, the PES scheme may impact those covariates (economic activities for example) which would bias the matching procedure. Note that matching methods have often been used as a pre-process to select a control group before estimating the impact through various econometric models according to the type of outcome variable or the research interests [ 49 , 77 80 ]. This might be especially convenient if the outcome is censored or binomial.…”
Section: Estimating the Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this only captures the impact of the program on enrolled parcels, while total estimates of additionality should also include leakages. Therefore, leakages should be estimated either through matching [ 49 , 58 ] or using a spatially lagged variables [ 80 ].…”
Section: Estimating the Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, we would observe a smaller impact of the formal protected areas on average. Further, unprotected ejidos receiving payments to protect forests and provide ecosystem services as well as those receiving technical assistance for monitoring and enforcement from non-governmental organizations are also likely to have lower deforestation rates, although the effect may be short-lived [11, 58, 59]. Similarly, the exclusion of the ejidos under Forest Sustainability Council (FSC) certification implies that the ejidos that are likely to perform best in terms of forest management have been excluded from the analysis and is, therefore, biasing the estimates of ejido effectiveness towards 0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%