2018
DOI: 10.1002/pen.24876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pervaporation separation of water–isopropyl alcohol mixture by PVA/LiBr membrane

Abstract: Hydrophilic polyvinyl alcohol membranes, modified by lithium bromide, were prepared with glutaraldehyde as a crosslinking reagent. The membranes were investigated for the pervaporation dehydration of a water–isopropyl systems. The effect of the feed temperature on permeation flux and membrane selectivity was studied. The characterization of modified membranes was performed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT‐IR), differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and X‐ray diffraction. It was observed that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dewatering performances of the PVA/zeolite MMMs for water‐alcohol separation are compared with those reported in the literature. Table 8 presents the NPA dewatering performances of various membranes 43,46,48–54 and Table 9 compares the IPA dehydration performances for different PVA‐based membranes developed since 2015 12–15,22,28,55–64 . As seen from Tables 8 and 9, the H‐20 MMM developed here has led to a separation factor of 1391 and 1711 for NPA/water and IPA/water solutions, respectively, when dewatering 90 wt% alcohol aqueous solution at 60°C, which are considerably larger than the other polymer‐based membranes under more or less similar dehydration conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The dewatering performances of the PVA/zeolite MMMs for water‐alcohol separation are compared with those reported in the literature. Table 8 presents the NPA dewatering performances of various membranes 43,46,48–54 and Table 9 compares the IPA dehydration performances for different PVA‐based membranes developed since 2015 12–15,22,28,55–64 . As seen from Tables 8 and 9, the H‐20 MMM developed here has led to a separation factor of 1391 and 1711 for NPA/water and IPA/water solutions, respectively, when dewatering 90 wt% alcohol aqueous solution at 60°C, which are considerably larger than the other polymer‐based membranes under more or less similar dehydration conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the following, the reasons for such changes are investigated, stating the diffusion and solubility coefficients. Moreover, the increase in the free space enclosed by the polymer provides more suitable space for smaller gases to pass resulting in more increase in the permeability of smaller molecules [30][31][32]. As shown in Figs.…”
Section: Gas Permeation Results Of Optically Active Ncsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The obtained membrane was cross‐linked in a bath containing 5 mL GA, 0.1 M of 1 mL HCl and 4 mL of distilled water in 90 mL of IPA for about 3 hours. [ 19,25,27 ] Finally, a four‐layered structure of SA coated PA‐TFC membrane (SA/PA‐TFC) was synthesized and evaluated for experimental studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%