2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pervaporation separation of ethanol–water mixtures through B-ZSM-11 zeolite membranes on macroporous supports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be stated at higher ethanol concentration the separation effectiveness of the organophilic pervaporation membranes are decreased, similar tendency have been already published by Slater et al [25], Lazarova et al [27], Vane [34], Chai et al [35] and Fu et al [36]. Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 summarize the estimated values of transport coefficients, activation energies, exponential parameters and minimized objective functions of the two models.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It can be stated at higher ethanol concentration the separation effectiveness of the organophilic pervaporation membranes are decreased, similar tendency have been already published by Slater et al [25], Lazarova et al [27], Vane [34], Chai et al [35] and Fu et al [36]. Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 summarize the estimated values of transport coefficients, activation energies, exponential parameters and minimized objective functions of the two models.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Recently, great efforts have been devoted to the development of suitable pervaporation membranes for removal of VOCs from water. Inorganic membranes, such as Ge‐ZSM‐5 and phenyl functionalized silica membranes, showed excellent separation performance for organics/water mixtures . However, their applications have been somewhat limited by the difficulty in fabrication of continuous inorganic membrane structures on technologically scalable, low‐cost platforms .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 and can be explained by the change in the hydrophobicity of B-ZSM-5 membranes as shown in Figures 6 and 7 and Figure S9 in Supporting Information. Figure 6 shows the water contact angles on surfaces of B-ZSM-5 with different B/Si ratios and silicalite-1 membranes.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 97%