2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peruvian genetic structure and their impact in the identification of Andean missing persons: A perspective from Ayacucho

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of dermatoglyphic patterns 33 detected similar features between northern and central Peruvian subpopulations, but they were both differentiated from highlanders of the Puno region (Titicaca Lake). In a recent study using STR markers, 34 Peruvians were suggested to be clustered in three main subgroups according to their geographical locations (north, central and south of Peru) and reported about 30% of admixture with nonautochthonous populations, a similar overall value compared with our results using K ¼ 2 ( Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A study of dermatoglyphic patterns 33 detected similar features between northern and central Peruvian subpopulations, but they were both differentiated from highlanders of the Puno region (Titicaca Lake). In a recent study using STR markers, 34 Peruvians were suggested to be clustered in three main subgroups according to their geographical locations (north, central and south of Peru) and reported about 30% of admixture with nonautochthonous populations, a similar overall value compared with our results using K ¼ 2 ( Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, we observe excess allele sharing of the NorthPeruCoast individuals with Sechura (a present-day North Peru Coast group) compared to Puno (a present-day Titicaca Basin group). Thus, the forced migrations imposed by the Inca and Spanish in these regions did not completely disrupt the genetic population structure that existed prior to these events ( Iannacone et al., 2011 ). Another example is significantly more allele sharing of CentralPeruCoast with Quechua speakers relative to Aymara speakers from the same region ( Reich et al., 2012 ), and, conversely, significantly more allele sharing of NorthChile and Titicaca Basin groups with Aymara speakers relative to Quechua speakers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regarding Peru, the genomic ancestry proportions based on autosomal STRs showed 30% of admixture with non-Native American populations [ 47 ], while proportions provided by INDEL polymorphisms in Peruvians from Coast, Andes and Amazon were identified as 83% Native American and 17% non-autochthonous, mainly from Europe [ 48 ]. These proportions allowed us to consider the results obtained by DAPC reliable ( Fig 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%