2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3712-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pertuzumab, trastuzumab and taxane-based treatment for visceral organ metastatic, trastuzumab-naïve breast cancer: real-life practice outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PERUSE findings complement results from the CLEOPATRA trial, indicating that findings from a phase III trial can be replicated in the routine clinical practice setting. The results also expand upon recently published retrospective and real-world studies of patients treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab and the investigator's chosen taxane in the United States, Italy and Turkey, which reported median PFS ranging from 17 to 29 months [14][15][16][17]. Strengths of PERUSE results compared with previous reports include the prospective nature of the study, the larger proportion of patients treated with paclitaxel instead of docetaxel, the more rigorous data collection and the regular schedule of tumour assessment according to RECIST (version 1.1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…PERUSE findings complement results from the CLEOPATRA trial, indicating that findings from a phase III trial can be replicated in the routine clinical practice setting. The results also expand upon recently published retrospective and real-world studies of patients treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab and the investigator's chosen taxane in the United States, Italy and Turkey, which reported median PFS ranging from 17 to 29 months [14][15][16][17]. Strengths of PERUSE results compared with previous reports include the prospective nature of the study, the larger proportion of patients treated with paclitaxel instead of docetaxel, the more rigorous data collection and the regular schedule of tumour assessment according to RECIST (version 1.1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The most frequent side effects in our study were fatigue and arthralgia/myalgia, with the rates of 75% and 64.3, respectively compared to 37.6% and 15% in CLEOPATRA, 26% and 6% in a retrospective analysis by Placido et al, respectively (12,17). In our study, neuropathy occurred in 8 (28.6%) patients, with the 5 (17.8%) of them being grade 3 compared to 11 (2.7%) patients in CLEOPATRA phase III trial, 60 (18.4%) patients in a retrospective analysis by Esin et al, and 89 (33.5%) patients in another study including 266 patients (18,19). As compared with literature, hematological side effects in our study were observed to be relatively at low rates, with 3 (10.7%) of the patients experiencing grade 1 thrombocytopenia compared to 25 (7.8%) of those in the study by Esin et al, with only 3 of them being grade 3-4 (19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In our study, neutropenia was seen in 8 (28.6%) patients, with 3 of them being grade 1-2 (10.7%), 4 (14%) grade 3, and 1 (3.6%) grade 4 versus 215 (52.8%) patients in CLEOPATRA trial, and 23 (15%) patients in Italian study (17). Robert et al reported the incidence of neutropenia and neutropenic fever in their study as 24.9% and 2.3%, respectively (18) compared to 35.7% and 4.1% in the retrospective study by Esin et al (19). As shown in our study, the rates of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were found to be at lower rates in other studies assessing the real life data than those found in phase III CLEOPATRA trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 13 (4.1%) patients with brain metastases on presentation attained a median PFS of 16.7 months and median OS of 26.7 months. 34 In another similar retrospective observational study on first-line TTPH in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, PFS was 20 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 13–27] in the group of patients with brain metastases at diagnosis (21of 264, 8%). 35 Although both studies support the efficacy of TTPH in patients with brain involvement, they did not specifically report on the response of the CNS metastases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%