To the Editor: I read with a great interest the recent article by Ebell et al 1 , reporting their meta-analysis on the accuracy of signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of pertussis. A timely recognition and diagnosis of cases of pertussis is fundamental for an appropriate clinical management preventing the potential complications, especially in children.1 Indeed, pediatric patients resulted to be more prone to respiratory problems related to pertussis, because of their smaller airway size and/or more accentuated cough reflexes and bronchial hyper-reactivity.2 Probably, for the same reason, children showed the typical clinical picture characterized with paroxysmal and whooping cough, and vomiting more frequently than adults. Indeed, Ebell et al 1 reported these 2 clinical aspects as being more accurate to diagnose pertussis in children than adults. Moreover, the typical signs and symptoms resulted to more sensitive, but less specific, in vaccinated people than in the unvaccinated population. However, as recognized by the authors themselves, several limitations could have affected those clinical results and, therefore, those conclusions might be considered with caution.