2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2019)208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbativity constraints on U(1)B−L and left-right models and implications for heavy gauge boson searches

Abstract: We derive perturbativity constraints on beyond standard model scenarios with extra gauge groups, such as SU (2) or U (1), whose generators contribute to the electric charge, and show that there are both upper and lower limits on the additional gauge couplings, from the requirement that the couplings remain perturbative up to the grand unification theory (GUT) scale. This leads to stringent constraints on the masses of the corresponding gauge bosons and their collider phenomenology. We specifically focus on the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(207 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid lines correspond to the chosen benchmark values of the hadronic parameters, while the dashed contours include the theoretical uncertainty. In the progressively shaded band at the top, t β 0.6, quark Yukawa couplings become non-perturbative [22], while at the left, for MW R < 6 TeV, the scalar sector becomes non-perturbative [31][32][33].…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Solid lines correspond to the chosen benchmark values of the hadronic parameters, while the dashed contours include the theoretical uncertainty. In the progressively shaded band at the top, t β 0.6, quark Yukawa couplings become non-perturbative [22], while at the left, for MW R < 6 TeV, the scalar sector becomes non-perturbative [31][32][33].…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion is however specific of the given setup and could be spoiled by envisaging, for instance, the presence of a PQ mechanism so that the LR scale might still be at the reach of arXiv:1911.09472v2 [hep-ph] 26 Dec 2019 LHC. Although M W R below 6 TeV is disfavored by the demand that the Higgs sector remains in a perturbative regime [31][32][33], an energy window remains for discovery via the KS process [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown in detail in Ref. [51] that this lower bound on the scale of breaking of the SU (2) R symmetry is obtained from stringent flavor constraints, assuming that all the gauge and quartic couplings remain perturbative up to the GUT scale. This makes it hard to detect the SU (2) R gauge bosons at the LHC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In order to address the above issues, there are many well motivated extensions of the SM like SUSY [14][15][16][17], two Higgs doublet model [18][19][20][21][22][23], extension of the SM with an extra U (1) gauge group [24][25][26][27] and many more. In this work, we have considered the gauged U (1) L µ −L τ extension of the SM due to its relatively simple theoretical structure and background free environment, which has a complete gauge group SU (3) C × SU (2) L × U (1) Y × U (1) L µ −L τ and is called the U (1) L µ −L τ model [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%