2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.62.114506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbative renormalization of weak Hamiltonian four-fermion operators with overlap fermions

Abstract: The renormalization of the most general dimension-six four-fermion operators without power subtractions is studied at one loop in lattice perturbation theory using overlap fermions. As expected, operators with different chirality do not mix among themselves and parity-conserving and parity-violating multiplets renormalize in the same way. The renormalization constants of unimproved and improved operators are also the same. These mixing factors are necessary to determine physical matrix elements relevant to man… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in fact, already in lattice perturbation theory, the tendency is that the one-loop corrections to Z and Z V are large because of a very large tadpole contribution to the self-energy [37,38] (while g 1 remains close to 1 as we find nonpertubatively). The net effect is already large at 6:0, for the usual s 0:4: Z V 1:247, and still larger for our s 0: Z V 1:444; we use Table 1 of Ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Lattice Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But in fact, already in lattice perturbation theory, the tendency is that the one-loop corrections to Z and Z V are large because of a very large tadpole contribution to the self-energy [37,38] (while g 1 remains close to 1 as we find nonpertubatively). The net effect is already large at 6:0, for the usual s 0:4: Z V 1:247, and still larger for our s 0: Z V 1:444; we use Table 1 of Ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Lattice Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The net effect is already large at 6:0, for the usual s 0:4: Z V 1:247, and still larger for our s 0: Z V 1:444; we use Table 1 of Ref. [37] for the analytical expressions (the definition of Z is different, but by a negligible amount); the numbers are quoted assuming a boosted perturbation theory (BPT) boosted coupling with g 2 BPT 1:68 (see Ref. [38] under Eq.…”
Section: Comparison With Lattice Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parity-conserving part of C m ± is then quadratically divergent 2 . The Z ± factors in (5) are simple linear combinations of Z S , Z V and Z ψ [8]. The C m ± coefficients are not needed for the physical K → ππ matrix elements; if K → π amplitudes are used, they can be determined by a 2-loop calculation or non-perturbatively using K → 0 matrix elements.…”
Section: Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Z's for ρ = 1.9 are indeed smaller than for ρ = 1.0, and closer to the Wilson results (see Table 1). The renormalization of the four-fermion operators of the ∆F = 2 and ∆S = 1 effective weak Hamiltonians has been studied together with L. Giusti [8]. They describe physics like the K 0 -K 0 and B 0 -B 0 mixings, the ∆I = 1/2 rule (octet enhancement) and the CP violation parameter ǫ ′ /ǫ.…”
Section: Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The renormalization of quark bilinears and fourquark operators, for domain-wall fermions, has been performed non-perturbatively in the RI scheme [22]. The same renormalization, for operators which have no power-divergences, has been performed at one loop for Neuberger fermions [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%