1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.53.4982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbative QCD study ofBD(*)decays

Abstract: We compute various form factors involved in B→D ( * ) transitions based on the perturbative QCD formalism, which includes Sudakov effects from the resummation of large radiative corrections in a heavy-light system. A two-parameter model wave function for D ( * ) mesons is fixed using data of the nonleptonic decays B→D ( * ) , from which the ratio of the decay constants f D* / f D ϭ0.92 is obtained. We then derive the spectrum of the semileptonic decay B→D*l in the fast recoil region of the D* meson, and extrac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Retaining the parton transverse momenta k T , the nonfactorizable topologies generate strong phases from non-pinched singularities of the hard kernels [34]. For example, the virtual quark propagator in Fig.…”
Section: B → Dπ In Pqcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retaining the parton transverse momenta k T , the nonfactorizable topologies generate strong phases from non-pinched singularities of the hard kernels [34]. For example, the virtual quark propagator in Fig.…”
Section: B → Dπ In Pqcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the nonfactorizable amplitudes, the factorization formulas involve the kinematic variables of all the three mesons [49], and the Sudakov factor is given by S = S B S Φ S K .…”
Section: B Factorization Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonfactorizable amplitudes have been also considered in the BBNS approach, which are, however, treated in a different way. For example, they are real because of some approximation in [22], but complex in PQCD [26]. Generally speaking, nonfactorizable contributions are less important compared to factorizable ones except in the cases where factorizable contributions are proportional to the small Wilson coefficients a 2 or vanish.…”
Section: Nonfactorizable and Annihilation Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to confirm these observations by interchaning the integration variables x 2 and x 3 in the second terms of Eqs. (23) and (26). The factorization formulas for F a1 from Fig.…”
Section: Factorization Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%