1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00518-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbative QCD correction to the light-cone sum rule for the and couplings

Abstract: The B * Bπ and D * Dπ couplings have previously been derived from a QCD lightcone sum rule in leading order. Here, we describe the calculation of the O(α s ) correction to the twist 2 term of this sum rule. The result is used for a first nextto-leading order analysis. We obtain g B * Bπ = 22 ± 7 and g D * Dπ = 10.5 ± 3, where the error indicates the remaining theoretical uncertainty.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

11
122
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
11
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eqs. (17) and (18) shows that the coupling constants in the vertices D * D s K and D * s DK are consistent with each other, but that they are smaller than the value given by the SU(4) symmetry in the ref. [4].…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Eqs. (17) and (18) shows that the coupling constants in the vertices D * D s K and D * s DK are consistent with each other, but that they are smaller than the value given by the SU(4) symmetry in the ref. [4].…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…[48] predicts g D * Dπ = 3.7 ± 1.1, i.e., g = 0.34 close to the "unlikely" light-front value), which are much smaller than the data. However, in a recent reanalysis of the D * Dπ coupling in the framework of the light-cone QCD sum rule [49] it was pointed out how agreement with the data could be attained (another attempt has been published in [50]).…”
Section: +04mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…While a recent (quenched) lattice study suggests that the gcoupling does not change when increasing the heavy quark mass (g b ≈ g c ) [13], the light cone QCD sum rule calculation predicts the suppression by about 25% (i.e. g b /g c ≈ 0.75) [14]. We will take the average of the two predictions and add the difference in the systematic uncertainty, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice in particular that the value of K/L 5 ratio follows from the present value of α − β = 0.00 ± 0.06, discussed in the previous section, through the use of eq. (14). That uncertainty may easily be reduced by the direct lattice calculation of the ratio R.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%