2021
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732321501054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbative S-matrix unitarity (S†S = 1) in Rμν2 gravity

Abstract: We show that in the quadratic curvature theory of gravity, or simply [Formula: see text] gravity, the tree-level unitarity bound (tree unitarity) is violated in the UV region but an analog for [Formula: see text]-matrix unitarity [Formula: see text] is satisfied. This theory is renormalizable, and hence the failure of tree unitarity is a counter example of Llewellyn Smith’s conjecture on the relation between them. We have recently proposed a new conjecture that [Formula: see text]-matrix unitarity gives the sa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why we consider both is that the former is a non-renormalizable theory while the latter is a renormalizable one. A part of our results has been reported briefly in [14]. In the present paper we obtain the matter-graviton scattering amplitudes in full, and study how the perturbative S-matrix unitarity is obeyed, even though the tree unitarity fails, in quadratic gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason why we consider both is that the former is a non-renormalizable theory while the latter is a renormalizable one. A part of our results has been reported briefly in [14]. In the present paper we obtain the matter-graviton scattering amplitudes in full, and study how the perturbative S-matrix unitarity is obeyed, even though the tree unitarity fails, in quadratic gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Berends and Gastmans use σ = +2, −2 as basis elements [16]. We use those constructed from the vector elements [14,47], given in eqs. (A.30) of appendix A.…”
Section: Jhep03(2023)213mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reactor experiments are usually categorized as short baseline (SBL) and long baseline (LBL). SBL experiments, like RENO (Bak et al 2018) and Daya‐Bay (Adey et al 2018), are sensitive to the mixing angle θ13$$ {\theta}_{13} $$ and to a mass splitting combination involving θ12$$ {\theta}_{12} $$, normalΔm312$$ \Delta {m}_{31}^2 $$, and normalΔm322$$ \Delta {m}_{32}^2 $$, while the LBL experiment KamLAND (Abe et al 2008; Gando et al 2011) is more sensitive to θ12$$ {\theta}_{12} $$ and normalΔm212$$ \Delta {m}_{21}^2 $$. The new SBL experiments NEOS (Ko et al 2017), DANSS (Alekseev et al 2018), STEREO (Almazán et al 2020), PROSPECT (Andriamirado et al 2021), NEUTRINO‐4 (Serebrov et al 2021), and SoLid (Abreu et al 2021) will be able to probe a mass splitting beyond the standard three active neutrino picture, with normalΔm21$$ \Delta {m}^2\sim 1 $$ eV2$$ {}^2 $$.…”
Section: Experimental Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 This condition guarantees the absence of ghost particles in GHEFT framework. See [62,63] for the discussion on the pseudo unitarity in theories with ghost particles.…”
Section: B Scalar Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%