2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.08.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbative computation of glueball superpotentials

Abstract: Using N = 1 superspace techniques in four dimensions we show how to perturbatively compute the superpotential generated for the glueball superfield upon integrating out massive charged fields. The technique applies to arbitrary gauge groups and representations. Moreover we show that for U (N ) gauge theories admitting a large N expansion the computation dramatically simplifies and we prove the validity of the recently proposed recipe for computation of this quantity in terms of planar diagrams of matrix integr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
418
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(430 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(14 reference statements)
12
418
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation to matrix models was studied also using supergraphs [78] and Konishi anomaly [54]. The same prepotential also underlies the physics of metastable brane-antibrane systems studied recently [9,79,77].…”
Section: Prepotential For Dijkgraaf-vafa (Civ-dv) Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The relation to matrix models was studied also using supergraphs [78] and Konishi anomaly [54]. The same prepotential also underlies the physics of metastable brane-antibrane systems studied recently [9,79,77].…”
Section: Prepotential For Dijkgraaf-vafa (Civ-dv) Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We have accounted for all vacua that we expect in four dimensions. One interesting feature of the solutions is that in the case with (N 1 , N 2 ) = (2, 2), all classical limits have Ļ† 1 = Ļ† 3 and Ļ† 2 = Ļ† 4 , but there is no solution whose classical limit obeys Ļ† 1 = Ļ† 2 and Ļ† 3 = Ļ† 4 . It therefore appears that one should be careful in choosing the right ordering of the eigenvalues, not all orderings will give rise to a solution of the quantum equations of motion.…”
Section: U(4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by geometric considerations of dualities in string theory [1,2], an expression for the quantum effective superpotential was proposed by Dijkgraaf and Vafa. They conjectured that the effective superpotential can be calculated by doing perturbative computation in an auxiliary matrix model [3,4,5], being later proved with perturbative field theory arguments in [6] and by the analysis of the generalized Konishi anomaly in [7,8,9]. This proposal provides direct connections between the computations in the matrix model descriptions with those in supersymmetric gauge theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%