2001
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/14/6/312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbations of the quadratic family of order two

Abstract: Define the quadratic family of order two as F µ (x, y) = (y, −x 2 + µx), where µ is a real parameter. The boundary of the basin of attraction of the fixed point at ∞ is an invariant curve for µ < 4, and is a Cantor set for µ > 4. Perturbations of F µ with µ = 4 were studied in Romero et al (2001 Discrete Continuous Dynam. Syst. 7 35) (also in higher dimension), where it was proved that these situations persist. Now we study perturbations of the bifurcation point µ = 4, where the explosion of the basin, B ∞ , o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to see that for all µ < µ 0 = − 1 12 the vertical delay endomorphism F µ has no fixed points. On the other hand, although the criterion for the attracting property is not available to calculate explicitly the number µ 1 , numerical experiments show that for µ 0.4 the nonwandering set of F µ has uncountably many components because the set of critical points of F µ is contained in B ∞ (F µ ) (see theorem 1 of [6]). These conditions do not imply that the nonwandering set of F µ is expanding or a Cantor set.…”
Section: Examples and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is easy to see that for all µ < µ 0 = − 1 12 the vertical delay endomorphism F µ has no fixed points. On the other hand, although the criterion for the attracting property is not available to calculate explicitly the number µ 1 , numerical experiments show that for µ 0.4 the nonwandering set of F µ has uncountably many components because the set of critical points of F µ is contained in B ∞ (F µ ) (see theorem 1 of [6]). These conditions do not imply that the nonwandering set of F µ is expanding or a Cantor set.…”
Section: Examples and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] and [6] some of these changes were studied for perturbations of the two dimensional quadratic family F µ (x, y) = (y, −x 2 + µx), where µ is a real parameter bigger than 1. It was proven there for this family, and it is conjectured for any vertical delay endomorphism, that for every µ such that the set of critical points of F µ is not contained in the basin of attraction of ∞, there exists a connected set J containing one of the fixed points of F µ and some critical points; moreover, J is forward invariant and it is contained in the boundary of B ∞ (F µ ).…”
Section: Examples and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most such studies, with good reason, have restricted their studies to families with only one or two parameters. For representative studies, see [Abraham et al(1997), Aronson et al(1982), Frouzakis et al(2003), Gumowski & Mira(1980a), Gumowski & Mira(1980b), Lorenz(1989), Mira et al(1996b), Romero et al(2001), Romero et al(2007), Romero et al (2014)]. Research more in the spirit of our classification approach (described below), but still for a restricted set of quadratic maps, includes [Bofill et al(2004)], where the authors study quadratic maps with no fixed points, and [Nien(1998)] where maps with bounded critical sets (points or ellipses) are studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to better understand the dynamics of critical maps, we have considered the family of perturbations of the quadratic family. This paper is a continuation of [12,13], where some dynamical properties of the perturbations of the family F µ in any dimension were analysed; it was shown that for any C 2 perturbation F , the point at ∞ is an attractor; moreover, if B ∞ (F ) is the basin of attraction of ∞, then its boundary is an invariant manifold containing the analytic continuation of the fixed point that the mapping F µ has at the origin. This in spite of the fact that this submanifold is not necessarily smooth nor normally hyperbolic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%