2015
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbations in growth trajectory due to early diet affect age‐related deterioration in performance

Abstract: Summary Fluctuations in early developmental conditions can cause changes in growth trajectories that subsequently affect the adult phenotype. Here, we investigated whether compensatory growth has long‐term consequences for patterns of senescence.Using three‐spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), we show that a brief period of dietary manipulation in early life affected skeletal growth rate not only during the manipulation itself, but also during a subsequent compensatory phase when fish caught up in siz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(101 reference statements)
2
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies did demonstrate a reduced longevity in animals showing accelerated growth after dietary restrictions (e.g. Inness & Metcalfe, ; Lee, Monaghan, & Metcalfe, ), yet disentangling the effects of the life‐history acceleration from the nutritional effects is challenging in such design (Lee et al., ). By manipulating development time using different photoperiods, hence levels of perceived time stress, we avoided this problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies did demonstrate a reduced longevity in animals showing accelerated growth after dietary restrictions (e.g. Inness & Metcalfe, ; Lee, Monaghan, & Metcalfe, ), yet disentangling the effects of the life‐history acceleration from the nutritional effects is challenging in such design (Lee et al., ). By manipulating development time using different photoperiods, hence levels of perceived time stress, we avoided this problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on whether accelerated growth affects energy allocation, individuals that accelerate their growth rate through increased foraging may pay an immediate cost in the form of delays in structural development (Arendt and Wilson, 2000), individual performance (e.g. swimming sprinting speed; Killen et al, 2014)reduced investment in tissue maintenance (Morgan et al, 2000) or reproduction (Auer et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2012Lee et al, , 2016, increased risk of predation while foraging (Gotthard, 2000). Rapid growth may lead to longer-term costs when it results in damage at the physiological or cellular level (Jennings et al, 1999;andreviewed in Metcalfe andMonaghan, 2001, 2003) and on a decreased lifespan (Lee et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both theoretical models and empirical studies have associated costs of compensatory growth with other fitness components (Metcalfe and Monaghan 2001, Yearsley et al 2004, Mangel and Munch 2005. For example, individuals that undergo compensatory responses during earlier life stages may have decreased ability to cope with starvation and oxidative stress (De Block and Stoks 2008a, Dmitriew and Rowe 2011, Gomez-Mestre et al 2013, reduced locomotion performance (Alonso-Alvarez et al 2006, Criscuolo et al 2011, life span (Lee et al 2013) or reproduction (Lee et al 2012(Lee et al , 2016. However, it is far from clear what the costs of the tradeoff between accelerated growth and fitness are, and on which fitness components these costs are reflected (Monaghan et al 2009, Auld et al 2010, as also conflicting results (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%