1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01181699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbations by quadratic forms and invariance of essential spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 3 is a direct generalization of the main result in [21] and of Example 1 from [13]. In the latter paper only self-adjoint operators are studied, while in the former one there is a requirement of ultracontractivity and the conditions on the coef®cients of the operator are much more restrictive.…”
Section: Second-order Elliptic Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 3 is a direct generalization of the main result in [21] and of Example 1 from [13]. In the latter paper only self-adjoint operators are studied, while in the former one there is a requirement of ultracontractivity and the conditions on the coef®cients of the operator are much more restrictive.…”
Section: Second-order Elliptic Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This problem was addressed by M. S. Birman [7], M. Reed and B. Simon [23], M. Schechter [24], D. E. Edmunds and W. D. Evans [11], R. Hempel [13], E. M. Ouhabaz [21], and in [22] in a more general setting.…”
Section: Second-order Elliptic Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various sufficient conditions exist under which the resolvent difference (H + 1) −1 − (H + 1) −1 is compact and, subsequently, H andH have the same essential spectrum. See [6,7,8,5] and references therein. These conditions typically involve some decay of the differencẽ a ij − a ij of the respective coefficients near infinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%