Perturbation of whole-brain dynamics in silico reveals mechanistic differences between brain states

Abstract

Human neuroimaging research has revealed that wakefulness and sleep involve very different activity patterns. Yet, it is not clear why brain states differ in their dynamical complexity, e.g. in the level of integration and segregation across brain networks over time. Here, we investigate the mechanisms underlying the dynamical stability of brain states using a novel off-line in silico perturbation protocol. We first adjust a whole-brain computational model to the basal dynamics of wakefulness and deep sleep recorded with fMRI in two independent human fMRI datasets. Then, the models of sleep and awake brain states are perturbed using two distinct multifocal protocols either promoting or disrupting synchronization in randomly selected brain areas. Once perturbation is halted, we use a novel measure, the Perturbative Integration Latency Index (PILI), to evaluate the recovery back to baseline. We find a clear distinction between models, consistently showing larger PILI in wakefulness than in deep sleep, corroborating previous experimental findings. In the models, larger recoveries are associated to a critical slowing down induced by a shift in the model's operation point, indicating that the awake brain operates further from a stable equilibrium than deep sleep. This novel approach opens up for a new level of artificial perturbative studies unconstrained by ethical limitations allowing for a deeper investigation of the dynamical properties of different brain states.

Brain network dynamics in schizophrenia: Reduced dynamism of the default mode network

“…Second, fitting the HMM to the concatenated data yielded a single set of inferred states that represented a consensus across all individuals. Finally, the effect of drowsiness or sleep (Deco et al, 2018;Tagliazucchi & Laufs, 2014) on our observations is unclear. To improve the fit of the model, an alternative approach would have been to independently fit a separate HMM to each individual or each diagnostic category.…”

“…The influence of antipsychotic medication (Moncrieff & Leo, 2010) on observed dynamics is also unknown. Finally, the effect of drowsiness or sleep (Deco et al, 2018;Tagliazucchi & Laufs, 2014) on our observations is unclear. Participants were instructed to remain awake during the scan, but there were no further measures to control or monitor sleep.…”

A Comparison between Theoretical and Experimental Measures of Consciousness as Integrated Information in an Anatomically Based Network of Coupled Oscillators

“…In this respect, [29] have suggested that the inability of Lempel-Ziv to compress efficiently low entropy sequences is due to the inability to cope with long runs of identical symbols. In this respect, the Perturbative Integration Latency Index that characterizes the latency of extinction of a massive stimulation perturbing a basal state without drawing upon Lempel-Ziv algorithm, recently proposed by [30], is a promising option that future works could explore.…”

Oscillations, criticality and responsiveness in complex brain networks

“…In this study, we hypothesized that perceptual binding associates with the brain's network response, and the network response largely depends on the ongoing coupled oscillation properties at stimulus onset. Recent studies have revealed that alpha oscillations transfer information through traveling waves in the cortex, and the global functional connectivity of alpha oscillations reflect conscious and unconscious states [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”