1987
DOI: 10.1364/ao.26.0774_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation correction for refraction in interferometric tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen that, contrary to Vest's assertion [9], the error is minimjzed by focusing slightly in front of the test section rather than at its centre. This fact has been noted before (see [l] and [14]), although in the former reference it was attributed to a computational artifact. Figure 3 shows the results of straight-line Abel inversion with L = 0 (chain curve)…”
Section: A Computer Experimentssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is seen that, contrary to Vest's assertion [9], the error is minimjzed by focusing slightly in front of the test section rather than at its centre. This fact has been noted before (see [l] and [14]), although in the former reference it was attributed to a computational artifact. Figure 3 shows the results of straight-line Abel inversion with L = 0 (chain curve)…”
Section: A Computer Experimentssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It is concluded that, provided the observation plane's position is accurately known, there is no advantage in ignoring refraction: the reconstruction formula, equation (14), is easily programmed and, for smoothly varying distributions, it yields excellent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To solve the Eikonal equation (2) ( or (1) ), the method of characteristics'0 is used to reduce the nonlinear Eikonal equation to the following system of linear differential equations dx p 3 ds n dy q (4 ds n dz r ds n dS (6) dp an (7) ds ax dq an (8) ds ay dr an 9 ds az ____________________ where x , y , z are the ray path coordinates, ds =s[ix)2 + (dy)2 + (dz)2 . Therefore, we can obtain the digitized form of ray tracing formulae: where j and j+1 enumerate successive increments along the ray path, and As is the numerical integration step size.…”
Section: Ray Trace Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%