2019
DOI: 10.1101/718064
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation-based mapping of natural frequencies with direct intracranial stimulation of the human brain

Abstract: Theoretical and experimental evidence suggest that the induction of oscillatory activity by an external rhythmic source on a specific brain area is maximally efficient if the input pattern matches its so-called 'natural' frequency, defined as the predominant neural rhythm at which the activity of this area tends to fluctuate spontaneously. Based on this principle, single pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) coupled to scalp electroencephalography (EEG) has provided evidence of frequency-specific power… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of natural frequency has not extensively been used in the literature. Until now, this concept has almost exclusively been employed to refer to the main frequency evoked by direct electrical/magnetic stimulation of a given brain region (Amengual et al, 2019;Ferrarelli et al, 2012;Rosanova et al, 2009). In this study, we have developed a map of natural frequencies that is highly compatible with the results obtained by direct cortical perturbation, but without interfering with ongoing brain activity.…”
Section: Natural Frequencies Vs Dominant Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept of natural frequency has not extensively been used in the literature. Until now, this concept has almost exclusively been employed to refer to the main frequency evoked by direct electrical/magnetic stimulation of a given brain region (Amengual et al, 2019;Ferrarelli et al, 2012;Rosanova et al, 2009). In this study, we have developed a map of natural frequencies that is highly compatible with the results obtained by direct cortical perturbation, but without interfering with ongoing brain activity.…”
Section: Natural Frequencies Vs Dominant Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have accurately detected natural frequencies within the alpha range in the occipital cortex, low beta-band responses in parietal and perirolandic areas, and high beta-band oscillations in the prefrontal cortex (Ferrarelli et al, 2012;Rosanova et al, 2009). Since TMS stimulation is restricted to few locations, Amengual et al (2019) have recently tried to develop a finer-grained atlas of natural frequencies by applying single pulses of intracranial electrical stimulation while recording iEEG in epileptic patients. Although this is a promising tool, the positioning of electrodes is constrained by clinical criteria for ethical reasons, resulting in some regions being over-sampled (e.g., temporal lobe), while others are under-sampled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%