2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persymmetric generalised adaptive matched filter for range‐spread targets in homogeneous environment

Abstract: This study deals with the problem of adaptively detecting range-spread targets in Gaussian environment, by assuming a persymmetric structure of covariance matrix. A persymmetric detector based on the two-step generalised likelihood ratio test design scheme is devised to reduce secondary data requirement, which ensures the constant false alarm rate property. Moreover, the general closed-form expressions of the probabilities of the false alarm and detection for the proposed detector are derived, in both cases of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While analyzing language features, it emphasizes the role of visual, auditory, and behavioral symbolic modes such as image, color, sound, and action in discourse. At present, how the various modes interact and how to affect the construction of overall meaning is an important topic of multimodal discourse analysis theory [4,5]. Among them, the study of grammatical rules of various modes restricts the further development of this field.…”
Section: Multimodal Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While analyzing language features, it emphasizes the role of visual, auditory, and behavioral symbolic modes such as image, color, sound, and action in discourse. At present, how the various modes interact and how to affect the construction of overall meaning is an important topic of multimodal discourse analysis theory [4,5]. Among them, the study of grammatical rules of various modes restricts the further development of this field.…”
Section: Multimodal Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, ZpHbold-italicMˆ1Zp ${\boldsymbol{Z}}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{H}}{\widehat{\boldsymbol{M}}}^{-1}{\boldsymbol{Z}}_{\mathrm{p}}$ in the numerator of (21) can be rewritten as ZpHbold-italicMˆ1Zp=γbold-italicZpHbold-italicM1bold-italicZp=γN1 ${\boldsymbol{Z}}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{H}}{\widehat{\boldsymbol{M}}}^{-1}{\boldsymbol{Z}}_{\mathrm{p}}=\gamma {\overline{\boldsymbol{Z}}}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{H}}{\overline{\boldsymbol{M}}}^{-1}{\overline{\boldsymbol{Z}}}_{\mathrm{p}}=\gamma {\boldsymbol{N}}_{1}$ where bold-italicZitalic‾p=M1/2Zp/γ,trueM=M1/2falseMˆM1/2 ${\overline{\boldsymbol{Z}}}_{\mathrm{p}}={\boldsymbol{M}}^{-1/2}{\boldsymbol{Z}}_{\mathrm{p}}/\sqrt{\gamma },\overline{\boldsymbol{M}}={\boldsymbol{M}}^{-1/2}\widehat{\boldsymbol{M}}{\boldsymbol{M}}^{-1/2}$. Obviously, under hypothesis H 0 , each column of bold-italicZp ${\overline{\boldsymbol{Z}}}_{\mathrm{p}}$ obeys to a zero‐mean complex circular Gaussian distribution with covariance matrix IN/2 ${\mathbf{I}}_{N}/2$ [1], that is, bold-italicZitalic‾pscriptCN()0...…”
Section: Adaptive Detector Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the problem of detecting a target signal in Gaussian clutter whose statistical property is completely unknown has received wide concerns in the field of radar signal processing [1][2][3][4][5]. For point-like target detection, Kelly's generalised likelihood ratio test (GLRT) [6] is one of the most representative detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, adaptive multichannel detection for targets in the Gaussian clutter with an unknown covariance matrix is an important topic for modern radar systems [6][7][8] and a set of target-free training data is usually assumed to be available [9][10][11] to estimate the unknown clutter covariance matrix in a homogeneous environment (HE) or a partially homogeneous environment (PHE). Herein, the HE indicates that the clutter components in test data share the identical covariance matrix with the training data [12,13]; while the PHE implies that the two clutter covariance matrices coincide only up to a scaling factor implying different clutter powers between the test and training data [14][15][16], which is also further generalised to a fully heterogeneous environment in Refs. [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%