1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00285.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persuasive Appeals and the Reduction of Skin Cancer Risk: The Roles of Appearance Concern, Perceived Benefits of a Tan, and Efficacy Information

Abstract: This experiment compared the effectiveness of appearance‐based messages focusing on the benefits of tanning and the efficacy of preventive measures on students' intentions to protect themselves against sun‐induced skin damage. Subjects who were high or low on a dispositional measure of appearance concern responded to 1 of 4 essays providing either high or low benefits information, and high or low efficacy information. Overall, subjects low in appearance concern expressed greater intentions to take precautionar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This inherent segregation is an appealing feature of PMT in the context of organic food choice and provides an expected structure to use in modeling preference heterogeneity. PMT has been widely applied in health studies (Greening & Stoppelbein, 2000;Houlding & Davidson, 2003;Plotnikoff, Trinh, Courneya, Karunamuni, & Sigal, 2009;Prentice-Dunn, Jones, & Floyd, 1997) (for a meta-analytic review see Milne, Sheeran, & Orbell, 2000) and there have been several applications of the theory to other topics (for a meta-analysis of research see Floyd et al, 2000). PMT has been extended to environmental issues (Bender, Martin, & Raish, 2007;Martens & Rost, 1998;Vaughn, 1993), injury protection (Axelrod & Newton, 1991;Wolf, Gregory, & Stephan, 1986), social concerns and food safety (Cates, Dian, & Schnepf, 2003;Cox & Bastiaans, 2007;Henson, Blandon, Cranfield, & Herath, 2010;Henson, Masakure, & Cranfield, 2008;Plotnikoff & Higginbotham, 1998;Schafer, Schafer, Bultena, & Hoiberg, 1993).…”
Section: Protection Motivation Theory In Food Choice and Its Constructsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This inherent segregation is an appealing feature of PMT in the context of organic food choice and provides an expected structure to use in modeling preference heterogeneity. PMT has been widely applied in health studies (Greening & Stoppelbein, 2000;Houlding & Davidson, 2003;Plotnikoff, Trinh, Courneya, Karunamuni, & Sigal, 2009;Prentice-Dunn, Jones, & Floyd, 1997) (for a meta-analytic review see Milne, Sheeran, & Orbell, 2000) and there have been several applications of the theory to other topics (for a meta-analysis of research see Floyd et al, 2000). PMT has been extended to environmental issues (Bender, Martin, & Raish, 2007;Martens & Rost, 1998;Vaughn, 1993), injury protection (Axelrod & Newton, 1991;Wolf, Gregory, & Stephan, 1986), social concerns and food safety (Cates, Dian, & Schnepf, 2003;Cox & Bastiaans, 2007;Henson, Blandon, Cranfield, & Herath, 2010;Henson, Masakure, & Cranfield, 2008;Plotnikoff & Higginbotham, 1998;Schafer, Schafer, Bultena, & Hoiberg, 1993).…”
Section: Protection Motivation Theory In Food Choice and Its Constructsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Prentice-Dunn, Jones, & Floyd, 1997). Coping self-efficacy (a = .92, M = 5.28, SD = 1.41) was evaluated with five, sevenpoint Likert-type scales ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree.…”
Section: Operational Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prentice-Dunn, Jones, & Floyd, 1997). Prentice-Dunn et al (1997) speculated that individuals high in appearance motive might have reacted defensively to a safe sun message.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%