2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2306820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persuading Skeptics and Reaffirming Believers

Abstract: In a world where rational individuals may hold di↵erent prior beliefs, a sender can influence the behavior of a receiver by controlling the informativeness of a signal. We characterize the set of distributions of posterior beliefs that can be induced by a signal, and provide necessary and su cient conditions for a sender to benefit from information control. We examine a class of models with no value of information control under common priors, and show that a sender generically benefits from information control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model also corresponds to the general class of Bayesian persuasion games, as described in the seminal paper by Kamenica and Gentzkow [2009]. As in Kamenica and Gentzkow [2009]; Rayo and Segal [2010]; and Alonso and Câmara [2014], the sender can benefit from non-full disclosure. The main difference between my approach and Bayesian persuasion models is that I have no commitment in the sender's strategy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model also corresponds to the general class of Bayesian persuasion games, as described in the seminal paper by Kamenica and Gentzkow [2009]. As in Kamenica and Gentzkow [2009]; Rayo and Segal [2010]; and Alonso and Câmara [2014], the sender can benefit from non-full disclosure. The main difference between my approach and Bayesian persuasion models is that I have no commitment in the sender's strategy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%