Perspektivierung im Text -- Interpretation und Verarbeitung

Abstract

Language possesses the capacity to express many different perspectives. As a general principle, the interpreter takes the speaker of an utterance to be the perspective-holder of the content that it conveys. This presumption of a speaker-default (Potts, 2005) seems to be a valid strategy as it frequently results in adequate interpretations. However, productive exceptions to this rule exist, as demonstrated in (1). Although the object pronoun me picks out the speaker, the perspective-sensitive content of friggin' seems to anchor to Monty as its perspective-holder.(1) [Context: We know that Bob loves to do yard work and is very proud of his lawn, but also that he has a son Monty who hates to do yard chores. So Bob could say (perhaps in response to his partner's suggestion that Monty be asked to mow the lawn while he is away on business):] Well, in fact Monty said to me this very morning that he hates to mow the friggin' lawn. 1factors (e. g., free indirect discourse, attitude verbs, counteridenticals). The experiments employ off-line as well as on-line methods; hence, the presented data offer evidence both on the final interpretation and the processing of texts involving perspective-sensitive expressions.The thesis presents empirical evidence of perspective-sensitive expressions and their interaction with information offered by the context, and such evidence is highly necessary. This dissertation enhances the understanding of the guiding mechanisms involved in perspective-dependent interpretations. It also contributes relevant data for the soughtafter long-term goal of a formal representation of the class of perspective-sensitive expressions. Therefore, the presented multi-faceted experimental data and the conclusions drawn based on these findings provide significant contributions for future research on linguistically expressed perspectivization.