Perspectives on the Pure-Tone Audiogram

Musiek, Frank E.; Shinn, Jennifer B.; Chermak, Gail D.; Bamiou, Doris‐Eva

doi:10.3766/jaaa.16061

Cited by 78 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 136 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…O audiograma é uma ferramenta primária para determinar o tipo, grau e configuração da perda auditiva e fornece aos profissionais informações apenas sobre a sensibilidade auditiva e nenhuma informação sobre o processamento auditivo central ou o processamento auditivo de fala ou música 6 . Por esse motivo existem testes capazes de avaliar a habilidade de resolução temporal, são eles:…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Foram utilizados na pesquisa o Teste de detecção de intervalos no silêncio -Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) 7 e o Teste de detecção de intervalos no ruído -Gap-in-noise (GIN) 6 . Os mesmos foram realizados pelo CD acoplado ao audiômetro Madsen Itera IIna sala de audição e linguagem do Laboratório de Inovação Tecnológica em Saúde da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Um estudo 6 evidenciou não ocorrer diferenças maiores do que 10 ms quando o teste RGDT foi reaplicado em adultos com uma semana de intervalo do primeiro teste. Em outros estudos 1,8 a reprodutibilidade do GIN foi considerada como excelente para os adultos na pesquisa de teste e reteste, incluindo boa sensibilidade e especificidade quando avaliado indivíduos com lesões neurológicas confirmadas 6 .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Reprodutibilidade de testes de resolução temporal em adultos

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ARTIGOS 309Distúrb Comun, São Paulo, 31(2): 308-316, junho, 2019 teste(T1) e reteste (T2) pelo mesmo avaliador (reprodutibilidade). Resultados: Não houve diferença entre as frequências testadas no RGDT (média) no T1 e T2. Houve diferença no desempenho do GIN entre orelha direita e esquerda no T2. A reprodutibilidade de teste-reteste no RGDT (média) e GIN foi substancial conforme o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse. Conclusão: Há reprodutibilidade no teste RGDT quando comparada a média das frequências e no teste GIN bilateralmente.Palavras-chave: Audição; Reprodutibilidade dos testes; Percepção Auditiva; Adultos. AbstractThe behavioral test is frequent clinical practice in audiology due to its contribution to the diagnosis and speech therapy intervention processes. Objective: To verify the reproducibility of temporal resolution assessment protocols in adults. Method: A total of 34 subjects, 22 females and 12 males, with an average age of 26.21 years (20 to 52 years old; dp = 8.92) were included, following the criteria: absence of otological and/or audiological history and school complaints; normality in the audiological pattern and in the dichotic test of digits. The Random Gap Detection and Gap in Noise tests, at 50 dB, were used. Both were applied in two moments; the second application with a one-week interval of the first. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyze the performance of the sample in the GIN test in the ear and Friedman test in order to analyze the RGDT as a function of the frequency tested in the two moments. The level of significance of 5% was adopted. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used in the analysis of the agreement between the test (T1) and retest (T2) applications by the same evaluator (reproducibility). Results: There was no difference between the frequencies tested in the RGDT (mean) in T1 and T2. There was a difference in GIN performance between the ears in T2. The test-retest reproducibility in the RGDT (mean) and GIN was substantial according to the intraclass correlation coefficient. Conclusion: There is reproducibility in the RGDT test when compared to the mean frequencies and in the GIN test bilaterally.

show abstract

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reprodutibilidade de testes de resolução temporal em adultos

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although essential for audiology, it has limitations, especially in the case of central auditory pathway involvement. Therefore, advances in auditory neuroscience highlight the considerably greater role of the central auditory nervous system (CANS) in auditory disorders and the like, thus requiring more specific evaluations of these structures 4 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of the socieconomic level on the temporal resolution hearing skills in adults

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to investigate the influence of the socioeconomic level on the temporal resolution auditory ability of adults. Methods: the sample consisted of 48 subjects aged 18 to 50 years, divided into three groups: G1, 11 subjects at level A; G2, 19 in B1 and B2 and G3, 18 in C1, C2, D and E. All subjects presented responses in 20 dB HL in frequencies of 500 to 4000 Hz, during audiometric screening, type A tympanometry, presence of contralateral and ipsilateral acoustic reflexes, no neurological, psychiatric and / or psychological changes diagnosed; without audiological and / or otological complaints and with performance above 95% in the dichotic digit test. The Random Gap Detection and Gap-in-noise tests were performed. The Shapiro-Wilk test for normality analysis and the Kruskall Wallis test for socioeconomic stratum analysis, were used, both with 5% significance. Results: there were statistically significant differences between the groups in the Random Gap Detection in the frequency of 500 Hz and in the average of the frequencies, as a function of the socioeconomic level, the same not being observed in the Gap-in-noise. Conclusions: it is suggested that the socioeconomic level be taken into account in the analysis of the Random Gap Detection test.

show abstract

“…First, the original review sought to explore the literature surrounding all stand-alone threshold hearing tests, that is PTA and electrophysiological testing, such as auditory brainstem response and or cortical AEP; however, given that PTA is the most commonly used hearing test to estimate hearing thresholds (Musiek et al, 2017), a decision was made to focus on PTA only. Second, the original review sought to include studies published in all languages.…”

Section: Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimising hearing services for adults living with dementia and hearing impairment in residential aged care facilities

Bott¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perspectives on the Pure-Tone Audiogram

Cited by 78 publications

References 136 publications

Reprodutibilidade de testes de resolução temporal em adultos

Reprodutibilidade de testes de resolução temporal em adultos

Influence of the socieconomic level on the temporal resolution hearing skills in adults

Optimising hearing services for adults living with dementia and hearing impairment in residential aged care facilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About