2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on the potential of entomopathogenic fungi in biological control of ticks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
89
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
89
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In agricultural crops, entomopathogenic fungi applied to foliage may be affected not only by sunlight exposure but also by rain, temperature variation, humidity, leaf surface chemistry, and phylloplane microbiota (see Jaronski 2010). On parasiteinfested livestock, in addition to the environmental factors noted above, the efficacy of topically applied fungal products may challenge the host-skin environment, with special consideration to the skin temperature, pH, secretions, sweat (with many components such as a wide range of ions), and skin microflora (Polar et al 2008;Fernandes et al 2012). Therefore, screening for promising fungal strains and formulating them for their tolerance to UV is just one of the basic important factors to be considered before evaluating the efficacy of the formulation in complex field experiments for pest control.…”
Section: Formulation To Protect Entomopathogenic Fungi Against Uv Radmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agricultural crops, entomopathogenic fungi applied to foliage may be affected not only by sunlight exposure but also by rain, temperature variation, humidity, leaf surface chemistry, and phylloplane microbiota (see Jaronski 2010). On parasiteinfested livestock, in addition to the environmental factors noted above, the efficacy of topically applied fungal products may challenge the host-skin environment, with special consideration to the skin temperature, pH, secretions, sweat (with many components such as a wide range of ions), and skin microflora (Polar et al 2008;Fernandes et al 2012). Therefore, screening for promising fungal strains and formulating them for their tolerance to UV is just one of the basic important factors to be considered before evaluating the efficacy of the formulation in complex field experiments for pest control.…”
Section: Formulation To Protect Entomopathogenic Fungi Against Uv Radmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae are the most promising bio controllers against both agricultural [1,2] and medical/veterinary pests, including some important arthropods ticks and mites, which parasitize humans and/or animals, i.e., Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Psoroptes spp., Dermanyssus gallinae [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los hongos entomopatógenos han demostrado tener gran potencial para el control biológico de Rhicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Ojeda-Chi et al, 2011;Fernandes et al, 2012). En condiciones de campo, la patogenicidad puede estar afectada por factores macroclimáticos tales como temperatura, humedad y radiación solar, así como factores microclimáticos, como secreciones químicas de la piel del animal, microflora y temperatura de la piel, los cuales Beauveria bassiana 1.3X10 12 conidias/ml, con 67.42 % en condiciones de campo, con aplicaciones repetidas cada 15 días, en horas de baja radiación solar (07:00-08:00); este porcentaje de mortalidad disminuyó con el paso de los días debido a que había una interacción entre el ambiente, las garrapatas del animal y los hongos, que condiciona la efectividad de estos últimos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified