2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-40221/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on the Early Quality of Evidence Guiding the Therapeutic Management of SARS CoV-2: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: Abstract Background:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak is a serious health concern. Repurposing of existing drugs indicated for other conditions seems to be the first choice for immediate therapeutic management. The quality of early evidence favoring the different treatment options needs to be apprised for informed decision making. Methods:In this systematic literature review, we apprised t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No article from Science Direct fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After reading the full text of these articles, 22 articles formed the final sample (19 articles from Medline, 1 from Cochrane library, and 2 from other resources) 4,14,16‐35 . Inter‐rater agreement following the first round of screening between the two investigators was 93.90% (Cohen's k = 0.842).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…No article from Science Direct fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After reading the full text of these articles, 22 articles formed the final sample (19 articles from Medline, 1 from Cochrane library, and 2 from other resources) 4,14,16‐35 . Inter‐rater agreement following the first round of screening between the two investigators was 93.90% (Cohen's k = 0.842).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using corticosteroids was associated with virus clearance time, hospital length of stay, or duration of symptoms in a cohort study. They finally stated that these pieces of evidence provided ambiguous results due to their designs and the endpoints assessed 14 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations