2013
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2013.272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on modelling micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants

Abstract: Models for predicting the fate of micropollutants (MPs) in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been developed to provide engineers and decision-makers with tools that they can use to improve their understanding of, and evaluate how to optimize, the removal of MPs and determine their impact on the receiving waters. This paper provides an overview of such models, and discusses the impact of regulation, engineering practice and research on model development. A review of the current status of MP models reveal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a review on STP models for organic xenobiotics, Clouzot et al () highlighted that different modeling approaches are preferable for research, practice (plant design) and regulatory purposes. Multimedia box models, such as SimpleTreat and the STP model (Bock et al ) have been the most widely applied in regulatory risk assessment, following the development of the fugacity concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review on STP models for organic xenobiotics, Clouzot et al () highlighted that different modeling approaches are preferable for research, practice (plant design) and regulatory purposes. Multimedia box models, such as SimpleTreat and the STP model (Bock et al ) have been the most widely applied in regulatory risk assessment, following the development of the fugacity concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Should sulphur compounds be considered in performance evaluation and in what way?  Do we consider ecotoxicity to evaluate micropollutant removal (Clouzot et al, 2013)?…”
Section: New Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…competition for iron), which of the (bio)chemical S-related oxido-reduction processes need to be included and how is the competition with methanogens to be modelled?  Do the traditional micropollutant fate models (volatilization, sorption, photolysis, biodegradation) that only require standard chemical properties (Henry coefficients, Kow, …) suffice or are dedicated models necessary for each micropollutant (Clouzot et al, 2013)?…”
Section: New Chemical and Biochemical Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ternes 1998) have promoted a substantial amount of research regarding the extension of ASMs to describe micropollutants (Clouzot et al 2013;Plósz et al 2013b). By micropollutants we mean compounds such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and biocides which are found in the environment in low concentrations (μg/L or ng/L).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%