2010
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2010.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on communication in labor and delivery: A focus group analysis

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to elicit and explore perceptions of barriers to optimal communication among clinicians on a labor and delivery unit, and to use this information to select and design approaches to improve communication.Study Design: A qualitative research design using a focus group format was utilized. Attending and resident obstetricians and anesthesiologists, as well as staff nurses, pharmacists and unit secretaries participated in the focus groups, which were recorded and transcri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework approach was chosen to analyze the data, as it is designed to facilitate a detailed examination of the nature and range of people's experiences, the needs of the study population, and the elements that affect the successful implementation of a new program or service (Ritchie & Spencer, 1994). The framework approach was developed for qualitative research in the areas of social and public policy, but has been refined over the years and has developed into a versatile analytic approach across a range of healthcare studies in areas such as the meaning of autism for families, communication in labor and delivery, and healthcare‐seeking in South Africa (Calzada, Pistrang, & Mandy, 2012; Grobman et al, 2011; Sharkey, Chopra, Jackson, Winch, & Minkovitz, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework approach was chosen to analyze the data, as it is designed to facilitate a detailed examination of the nature and range of people's experiences, the needs of the study population, and the elements that affect the successful implementation of a new program or service (Ritchie & Spencer, 1994). The framework approach was developed for qualitative research in the areas of social and public policy, but has been refined over the years and has developed into a versatile analytic approach across a range of healthcare studies in areas such as the meaning of autism for families, communication in labor and delivery, and healthcare‐seeking in South Africa (Calzada, Pistrang, & Mandy, 2012; Grobman et al, 2011; Sharkey, Chopra, Jackson, Winch, & Minkovitz, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miscommunication is a common and significant cause of safety issues (Grobman et al, 2011; Kennedy & Lyndon, 2008; Lyndon et al, 2012; Maxfield, Grenny, Lavandero, & Groah, 2011; Maxfield, Grenny, McMillan, Patterson, & Switzer, 2005; Simpson, James, & Knox, 2006). Several groups have demonstrated improvement in the culture of safety and presumably communication and teamwork in perinatal settings (Pettker et al, 2011; Simpson, Knox, Martin, George, & Watson, 2011; Thanh, Jacobs, Wanke, Hense, & Sauve, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In childbirth specifically, the unit design has been identified as a factor that affects communication and team decision making, corresponding with our theme of sharing knowledge and workload. Focus groups with nurses, obstetricians, residents, and other clinical and support staff working with labor and delivery suggested that communication can be affected by the locations of key patient care information (eg, in bedside documentation, on shared boards, or in the electronic records) and the technology available in the unit for communication among team members . Another observational study in 4 maternity units in England suggested that having a centralized location in the unit that captured and presented all key information about all women's statuses and care plans was a key factor in facilitating situational awareness for clinical teams .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%