Perspectives on cancer screening participation in a highly urbanized region: a Q-methodology study in The Hague, the Netherlands

Abstract

Background The Netherlands hosts, as many other European countries, three population-based cancer screening programmes (CSPs). The overall uptake among these CSPs is high, but has decreased over recent years. Especially in highly urbanized regions the uptake rates tend to fall below the minimal effective rate of 70% set by the World Health Organization. Understanding the reasons underlying the decision of citizens to partake in a CPS are essential in order to optimize the current screening participation rates. The aim of this study was to explore the various perspectives concerning cancer screening among inhabitants of The Hague, a highly urbanized region of the Netherlands. Methods A Q-methodology study was conducted to provide insight in the prevailing perspectives on partaking in CSPs. All respondents were inhabitants of the city of The Hague, the Netherlands. In an online application they ranked a set of 31 statements, based on the current available literature and clustered by the Integrated Change model, into a 9-column forced ranking grid according to level of agreement, followed by a short survey. Respondents were asked to participate in a subsequent interview to explain their ranking. By-person factor analysis was used to identify distinct perspectives, which were interpreted using data from the rankings and interviews. Results Three distinct perspectives were identified: 1). “Positive about participation”, 2). “Thoughtful about participation”, and 3). “Fear drives participation”. These perspectives provide insight into how potential respondents, living in an urbanized region in the Netherlands, decide upon partaking in CSPs. Conclusions Since CSPs will only be effective when participation rates are sufficiently high, it is essential to have insight into the different perspectives among potential respondents concerning partaking in a CSP. This study adds new insights concerning these perspectives and suggests several ideas for future optimization of the CSPs.

Socio‐economic disparities in hospital care among Dutch patients with diabetes mellitus

“…Therefore, this SES measure is a combined income, education and employment score. These SES scores are often used in health inequality studies from the Netherlands 23,24 . Information on sex, 5‐year age categories and the hospital where the patient received treatment were also obtained.…”

“…These SES scores are often used in health inequality studies from the Netherlands. 23,24 Information on sex, 5-year age categories and the hospital where the patient received treatment were also obtained. The remaining data only comprised complete and accurate claims; therefore, no missing data was present in the other variables.…”