2023
DOI: 10.1037/met0000443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on Bayesian inference and their implications for data analysis.

Abstract: Use of Bayesian methods has proliferated in recent years as technological and software developments have made Bayesian methods more approachable for researchers working with empirical data. Connected with the increased usage of Bayesian methods in empirical studies is a corresponding increase in recommendations and best practices for Bayesian methods. However, given the extensive scope of Bayes, theorem, there are various compelling perspectives one could adopt for its application. This paper first describes f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(249 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Zyphur et al (2021) noted, maximum likelihood estimation can have difficulty "when estimating timevarying unit effects and multiple lagged effects" (p. 2), whereas Bayesian estimation can fit the models. Such a use of Bayesian analysis is consistent with computational frequentism (Levy and McNeish, 2023), which involves "turn [ing] to Bayesian methods to bypass complexities posed by frequentist methods" (p. 721). Zyphur et al (2021) further noted that choosing the parameterization for the unit effect factor loadings is arbitrary, with alternatives necessary to obtain model identification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As Zyphur et al (2021) noted, maximum likelihood estimation can have difficulty "when estimating timevarying unit effects and multiple lagged effects" (p. 2), whereas Bayesian estimation can fit the models. Such a use of Bayesian analysis is consistent with computational frequentism (Levy and McNeish, 2023), which involves "turn [ing] to Bayesian methods to bypass complexities posed by frequentist methods" (p. 721). Zyphur et al (2021) further noted that choosing the parameterization for the unit effect factor loadings is arbitrary, with alternatives necessary to obtain model identification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Bayesian estimation is preferred with DSEM for computational purposes because maximum likelihood and other frequentist methods often encounter convergence issues or are intractable with many latent variables (Asparouhov et al, 2018). This reflects a "Bayes as Computational Frequentism" approach whereby computational advantages of Markov Chain Monte Carlo motivate Bayesian methods rather than a philosophical Bayesian approach where subjective beliefs are built into the model (Levy & McNeish, 2022). Because the motivation for Bayesian methods is computational rather than philosophical, the interpretation of the results minimally deviates from a model estimated with frequentist methods and the Mplus output changes little when the estimation Bayesian compared to when the estimation is frequentist.…”
Section: Model Fitting and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many perspectives exist that underlie the scientific rationale for using Bayesian methods (Levy & McNeish, 2021). For example, a model may be too complex for frequentist estimation methods, such as maximum likelihood.…”
Section: Bayesian Framework Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%