Perspectives of Nurses and Doulas on the Use of Information and Communication Technology in Intercultural Pediatric Care: Qualitative Pilot Study (Preprint)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Sweden is rapidly becoming an increasingly multicultural and digitalized society. Encounters between pediatric nurses and migrant mothers, who are often primary caregivers, are impeded by language problems and cultural differences. To support mothers, doulas, who are women having the same linguistic and cultural backgrounds, serve as cultural bridges in interactions with health care professionals. In addition, information and communication technology (ICT) can potentially be used to manage interactions owing to its accessibility. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the role of ICT in managing communicative challenges related to language problems and cultural differences in encounters with migrant mothers from the perspectives of Swedish pediatric nurses and doulas. METHODS Deep semistructured interviews with five pediatric nurses and four doulas from a migrant-dense urban area in western Sweden were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS The results showed that ICT contributes to mitigating communicative challenges in interactions by providing opportunities for nurses and migrant mothers to receive distance interpreting via telephones and to themselves interpret using language translation apps. Using images and films from the internet is especially beneficial while discussing complex and culturally sensitive issues to complement or substitute verbal messages. These findings suggest that ICT helps enable migrant mothers to play a more active role in interactions with health care professionals. This has important implications for their involvement in other areas, such as child care, language learning, and integration in Sweden. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that ICT can be a bridging tool between health care professionals and migrants. The advantages and disadvantages of translation tools should be discussed to ensure that quality communication occurs in health care interactions and that health information is accessible. This study also suggests the development of targeted multimodal digital support, including pictorial and video resources, for pediatric care services.

Patient participation in decision-making about cardiovascular preventive drugs – resistance as agency

“…In recommendations for physicians to practice shared decision-making, maximal patient participation is often portrayed as an ideal. Our results, in accordance with recent conversation analytical work, suggest that patients do not always want to decide, or take responsibility for decisions [ 5 , 20 , 24 ]. This makes GPs’ deferral of responsibility and decisional authority problematic.…”

“…Considering the consistency of our findings with previous studies, local traditions don’t seem to have a fundamental impact on the communicative patterns under study. The frequent use of “one” in Swedish, and its importance in the allocation of responsibility and agency in decision-making may not be transferable to languages where pronouns are used differently [ 20 ]. On the other hand, although a typical Swedish communicative practice, it accomplishes renouncement of responsibility and agency in decision-making, which is a general phenomenon [ 5 , 21 ].…”

“…The impersonal “one” has been described to be used by Swedish phycisians in an ambiguous way, with the potential to mean health care provider/-s including or excluding the patient [ 20 ]. GP’s use of one, referring to the medical expert community, is a variant of “health care providers in general excluding the patient” which seems to distance the GP from personal responsibility.…”

Understanding medical professionalism using express team-based learning; a qualitative case-based study

“…Culture strongly impacts patients’ health, illness, and compliance perceptions. Culturally sensitive healthcare providers are better equipped to address these differences and provide higher-quality and more equitable care to all patients [ 37 , 38 ]. Comfort to the patient – Patient compliance is increased when they believe in their treatment.…”