Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup analysis

Mirchandani, Dinesh A.; Johnson, Julius H.; Joshi, Kailash

doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9102-7

Cited by 58 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Beside these two commentaries the special issue of Information System Frontiers provides research results of different applications like social networking (Griffiths and Light 2008), mobile data services (Hong et al 2008) and e-government (e.g. Mirchandani et al 2008) all discussing important aspects of the adoption and diffusion of ICT in the household context.…”

Section: Household Context and Social Influencementioning

confidence: 99%

Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article suggests a model for examining the adoption of e-recruiting by individuals. The model is empirically evaluated using survey data from 323 full and under age applicants. The results explain substantial parts of the individual adoption decision. Interestingly, the relative importance of the adoption drivers varies with age, social environment and the level of education. While, as expected, overall Performance Expectancy is the major force behind adopting e-recruiting, the relative importance of the other factors differs a lot. Whereas Facilitating Conditions came out as an important driver for under age pupils, full age students by contrast are highly driven by the influence of their peer groups and the communication of the respective company they apply for. A major outcome is that the Subjective Norm of family and friends, teachers and professors has a weaker influence for under age pupils who mostly live with their parents than for the group of students who already left home to study at college. Consequentially we assume that the social influence of peer groups on an individual's adoption differs with respect to age, social environment and level of education. This should be investigated more carefully in future adoption research as it might provide an answer for the varying significance of Subjective Norm in adoption research.

show abstract

Section: Household Context and Social Influencementioning

confidence: 99%

Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Five studies [20,24,29,52,58] used TAM and TPB together, four of them [6,24,48,77] used even three theories or models, whereas three [32,68,74] Survey: [6], [8], [9], [12], [16], [20], [24], [29], [32], [48], [49], [52], [58], [63], [67], [68], [74], [77], [76], [79], [86]; Interview: [84], [86], [89]; Secondary Data Analysis: [31]; Case Study: [69] Information System Success Model (DeLone and McLean, 1992McLean, , 2003 Survey: [19], [22], [30], [32], [55], [59], [65], [68], [74], …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diversity and Diffusion of Theories, Models, and Theoretical Constructs in eGovernment Research

Rana¹,

Williams²,

Dwivedi³

et al. 2011

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. After more than a decade of research in the field of e-government, it is now timely and appropriate to reflect upon the overall developmental directions in the area. The purpose of this paper is to explore research progress to date by systematically analysing the existing body of knowledge on egovernment related issues. Usable data relating to e-government research currently available were collected from 434 research articles. Based on the investigation of the various studies, our findings reveal that survey was the most utilised research method, and the Technology Acceptance Model was the most utilised theory to explain research models. Although a large number of theories and theoretical constructs were borrowed from the reference disciplines, their exploitation by e-government researchers appears largely random in approach. The paper also presents limitations and further research directions.

show abstract

“…The author group the general reviews, theoretical framework papers, research notes, and editorial articles as a conceptual approach, which is third placed. In addition, as suggested by Gomez [3], mixed methods research has invited some interests to ICTD researchers and would be growing in the future [34]- [38]. Fig.…”

Section: Research Methods Used In Ictd Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review on ICTD Research by IS Community

Ramadani

2017

TEKNOSI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite a huge number of Information and Communications Technology for Development (ICTD) research so far, little is known about the landscape of published articles in Information Systems (IS) literature. This paper systematically reviews extant ICTD research published in the IS field from 1980-2016. The author systematically analyzed 192 articles published in A* and A-rank IS journals and explored which theoretical lenses, contexts, units of analysis, types of technology, and research methods dominate extant research in the field. As such, this present work provides a unique snapshot of the current research landscape that can help future ICTD field progress.

show abstract

Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup analysis

Cited by 58 publications

References 37 publications

Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants

Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants

Diversity and Diffusion of Theories, Models, and Theoretical Constructs in eGovernment Research

A Systematic Literature Review on ICTD Research by IS Community

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About