2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2018.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives of antiferromagnetic spintronics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
142
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
142
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All the SSE data taken at different magnetic fields up to 12 T near and above the critical point T N follow the critical scaling law very well with the critical exponents for magnetic susceptibility of 3D Ising systems, which suggests that the AFM spin correlation is responsible for the observed SSE near T N . 2 Antiferromagnetic insulators (AFMI) have recently attracted a great deal of interest in the emerging field of antiferromagnetic spintronics due to their unique properties such as robustness against magnetic field perturbation and ultrafast spin-dynamics [1][2][3][4]. In early reports, thin AFMI layers are found to enhance spin current transmission when they are inserted between a ferrimagnetic insulator (FMI) and a heavy metal (HM), such as the NiO and CoO AFMI layers in Y 3 Fe 5 O 12 (YIG)/NiO/Pt [5,6] and YIG/CoO/Pt [6], where an increased spin Seebeck effect (SSE) signal is attributed to the enhanced spin conductance in the AFMI spacer around its phase transition temperature [6,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the SSE data taken at different magnetic fields up to 12 T near and above the critical point T N follow the critical scaling law very well with the critical exponents for magnetic susceptibility of 3D Ising systems, which suggests that the AFM spin correlation is responsible for the observed SSE near T N . 2 Antiferromagnetic insulators (AFMI) have recently attracted a great deal of interest in the emerging field of antiferromagnetic spintronics due to their unique properties such as robustness against magnetic field perturbation and ultrafast spin-dynamics [1][2][3][4]. In early reports, thin AFMI layers are found to enhance spin current transmission when they are inserted between a ferrimagnetic insulator (FMI) and a heavy metal (HM), such as the NiO and CoO AFMI layers in Y 3 Fe 5 O 12 (YIG)/NiO/Pt [5,6] and YIG/CoO/Pt [6], where an increased spin Seebeck effect (SSE) signal is attributed to the enhanced spin conductance in the AFMI spacer around its phase transition temperature [6,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to clarify the physical origin of the SSE in AFMI, a uniaxial AFMI with an unusually high spinflop field is desired so that no equilibrium magnetization is induced with any laboratory accessible magnetic field. 3 Besides the FMI and AFMI, paramagnetic insulators (PMIs) have also been reported as a source of pure spin currents. SSE signals were observed in Gd 3 Ga 5 O 12 (GGG)/Pt [22], DyScO 3 (DSO)/Pt [22], and CoCr 2 O 4 (CCO)/Pt [23] over the temperature range where GGG, DSO, and CCO are PMIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a lack of clarity concerning the microscopic mechanisms of the Néel vector switching, these experiments have been widely regarded as a breakthrough in the emerging field of THz spintronics 26,30,36,[39][40][41][42][43] . It has been suggested that current-induced Néel vector dynamics in an AFM is driven primarily by the so-called Néel spin-orbit torques 29,32,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the practical results was the development of magnetic memories with purely electronic write-in and readout processes as an alternative to existing solid state drive technologies 4,5 . An increasing demand for ever higher performance computation and ever faster big data analytics has sparked recently the interest to antiferromagnetic spintronics [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] , i. e. to the usage of much more subtle antiferromagnetic order parameter to store and process information. This idea is driven primarily by the expectation that antiferromagnetic materials may naturally allow for up to THz operation frequencies 11,13,14 in sharp contrast to ferromagnets whose current-induced magnetization dynamics is fundamentally limited to GHz frequency range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%