2020
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives in Wireless Radio Frequency Coil Development for Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract: This paper addresses the scientific and technological challenges related to the development of wireless radio frequency (RF) coils for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on published literature together with the authors' interpretation and further considerations. Key requirements and possible strategies for the wireless implementation of three important subsystems, namely the MR receive signal chain, control signaling, and on-coil power supply, are presented and discussed. For RF signals of modern MRI setu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analog MRI RF signal acquired from the subject must first be sampled, digitized, and potentially compressed for large data sets (eg, from arrays with many coil elements) before it can be wirelessly transmitted. To this end, the analog RF signal can be sampled "on-coil" with high-speed, high-resolution, MR-compatible analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) using analog down conversion, 33 direct undersampling, 34,35 or baseband demodulation sampling techniques, 36 which can reduce the amount of data, and therefore the data rate, to be wirelessly transmitted. 37 For example, a modern 3T 64-channel RF coil array has been estimated to only require a minimum data rate of 512 Mbps, or 8 Mbps/coil element, using 16-bit ADCs and a demodulated baseband technique.…”
Section: Wireless Rf Coil Arrays For Wireless Mri Data Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The analog MRI RF signal acquired from the subject must first be sampled, digitized, and potentially compressed for large data sets (eg, from arrays with many coil elements) before it can be wirelessly transmitted. To this end, the analog RF signal can be sampled "on-coil" with high-speed, high-resolution, MR-compatible analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) using analog down conversion, 33 direct undersampling, 34,35 or baseband demodulation sampling techniques, 36 which can reduce the amount of data, and therefore the data rate, to be wirelessly transmitted. 37 For example, a modern 3T 64-channel RF coil array has been estimated to only require a minimum data rate of 512 Mbps, or 8 Mbps/coil element, using 16-bit ADCs and a demodulated baseband technique.…”
Section: Wireless Rf Coil Arrays For Wireless Mri Data Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 For example, a modern 3T 64-channel RF coil array has been estimated to only require a minimum data rate of 512 Mbps, or 8 Mbps/coil element, using 16-bit ADCs and a demodulated baseband technique. 33,38,39 Critically, the ADCs data acquisition clock must be wirelessly synchronized with the MRI scanner clock using additional software and in-bore hardware to avoid clock-jitter, which effectively reduces the number of ADC sampled bits and can result in image artifacts. 40,41 The clock synchronization is an active area of research in wireless MRI and is a major obstacle to the ubiquitous use of wireless MRI in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Wireless Rf Coil Arrays For Wireless Mri Data Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, optical fibers guarantee patient safety while reducing signal interferences, although problems related to placement and curvature of the fibers still limit the coils positioning and handling. Wireless coils seem to enable the building of "wearable" coil arrays, which improves patient comfort and supports the integration of different channels at the coil level: in this way, channel number is exclusively dependent on the coils and not on system ADC inputs number as for the standard scanner [79].…”
Section: Digital Coilsmentioning
confidence: 99%