2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharma.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives and strategies of alternative methods used in the risk assessment of personal care products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have developed and adopted many alternative methods to assess the irritation potential of cosmetic ingredients based on cellular responses and molecular pathways leading to adverse endpoints. 13 These assays are rapid, inexpensive, and high-throughput compared to animal models and can be used to investigate the toxicological mechanism of chemicals. 14 In this study, we used the patch test and repeated open application test (ROAT), which are two regulatory methods used to evaluate adverse skin effects of cosmetics in China, to examine the skin irritation potential of five commonly used cosmetic preservatives in the general population, including phenoxyethanol, methylparaben, propylparaben, imidazolidinyl urea, and DMDM hydantoin.…”
Section: Validation Of Alternative Methods (Ecvam) and Organization Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have developed and adopted many alternative methods to assess the irritation potential of cosmetic ingredients based on cellular responses and molecular pathways leading to adverse endpoints. 13 These assays are rapid, inexpensive, and high-throughput compared to animal models and can be used to investigate the toxicological mechanism of chemicals. 14 In this study, we used the patch test and repeated open application test (ROAT), which are two regulatory methods used to evaluate adverse skin effects of cosmetics in China, to examine the skin irritation potential of five commonly used cosmetic preservatives in the general population, including phenoxyethanol, methylparaben, propylparaben, imidazolidinyl urea, and DMDM hydantoin.…”
Section: Validation Of Alternative Methods (Ecvam) and Organization Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing political and ethical demand to replace animal experiments, many countries have set regulatory requirements to evaluate the safety of cosmetic ingredients using nonanimal test methods, especially in Europe 12 . The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) and Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) have developed and adopted many alternative methods to assess the irritation potential of cosmetic ingredients based on cellular responses and molecular pathways leading to adverse endpoints 13 . These assays are rapid, inexpensive, and high‐throughput compared to animal models and can be used to investigate the toxicological mechanism of chemicals 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies thalidomide was shown to be a low-risk drug regarding intoxication and side effects, however in the 1960s it was responsible for the congenital malformation of thousands of children. Similarly, the Draize test in rabbits for ocular and cutaneous irritation by substances, especially cosmetics, has low reproducibility and highlights concerns about extrapolation of test results in animals to humans (Quantin et al ., 2015). In vivo tests have some advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: In Vivo Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of particular relevance for cosmetic formulations, as the EU has banned animal testing of cosmetic ingredients since 2013 [7]. This framework has stemmed the development of alternative methods for the safety assessment of topical ingredients and in vitro approaches based on cell culture have risen to prominence [8]. Many of these methodologies can also be highly relevant in efficacy testing of skin repair ingredients [9] since the impact in cellular mechanisms such as proliferation or migration can be more easily dissected in vitro.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%