Perspectives and experiences of new migrants on health screening in Sweden

Abstract

BackgroundIn Sweden, migrants from countries considered to have a high burden of certain infectious diseases are offered health screening to prevent the spread of these diseases, but also identify their health needs. However, very little is known about their experiences and perceptions about the screening process. This study aimed at exploring these perceptions and experiences in order to inform policy and clinical practice.MethodUsing an interpretive description framework, 26 new migrants were interviewed between April and June 2013 in four Swedish counties. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data.ResultsThe three themes developed include: new country, new practices; new requirements in the new country; and unmet needs and expectations. Participants described what it meant for them to come to a new country with a foreign language, new ways of communicating with caregivers/authorities and being offered health screening without clarification. Participants perceived health screening as a requirement from the authorities to be fulfilled by all newcomers but conceded that it benefits equally the host society and themselves. However, they also expressed concern over the involvement of the Migration Board staff and feared possible collaboration with health service to their detriment. They further stated that the screening program fell short of their expectations as it mainly focused on identifying infectious diseases and overlooked their actual health needs. Finally, they expressed frustration over delay in screening, poor living conditions in reception centers and the restrictive entitlement to care.ConclusionsMigrants are aware of their vulnerability and the need to undergo health screening though they view it as an official requirement. Thus, those who underwent the screening were more concerned about residency rather than the actual benefits of screening. The issues highlighted in this study may limit access to and uptake of the screening service, and compromise its effectiveness. To maximize the uptake: (1) linguistically and culturally adapted information is needed, (2) other screening approaches should be tried, (3) trained medical interpreters should be used, (4) a holistic and human right approach should be applied, (5) the involvement of migration staff should be reconsidered to avoid confusion and worries. Finally, to improve the effectiveness, (6) all migrants from targeted countries should be offered screening and efforts should be taken to improve the health literacy of migrants and the living conditions in reception centers.

The need for trust and safety inducing encounters: a qualitative exploration of women’s experiences of seeking perinatal care when living as undocumented migrants in Sweden

“…The rationale guiding the present study was constructed on the empirical indication that undocumented migrant women are in need of qualified and informed care [ 23 , 34 ], accenting the importance of promoting supporting and trusting clinical relationships at antenatal healthcare centers (ANHC). Nevertheless, studies involving migrants have shown that language barriers resulted in difficulties with booking appointments for healthcare services, and in cases where services were provided, feelings of being ignored, discriminated against, and/or being sent home without receiving the sought-out care have been reported [ 25 , 35 – 37 ]. Furthermore, a recent study found that receptionists at healthcare facilities have refused access to women who presented without residency status, and women have also been required to pay in advance when seeking abortions [ 25 ].…”

Health literacy in selected populations: Individuals, families, and communities from the international and cultural perspective

“…In cultures where screening for diseases is not usual practice, it may be seen as an unnecessary 'secondary issue'; immigrants from such cultures often do not believe that they should undergo health screening because they perceived themselves as healthy [21]. Some believe that they have no choice about whether or not to attend health screening; the 'invitation' may be interpreted as a 'requirement' from the authorities to all the newcomers, for the benefits of society as a whole, rather than individuals themselves [43].…”

Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda

“…Both Norway and Sweden are generally acknowledged to have fairly extensive universal health care (UHC) systems, although particularly illegal immigrants are known to suffer from poor access to basic health care[68,79].…”