2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspective on the Interfacial Reduction Reaction

Abstract: Chemical reactions involving oxidation and reduction processes at interfaces may vary from those in conventional liquid-phase or solid-phase reactions and could influence the overall outcome. This article primarily features a study on metal−ligand coordination at the solid−liquid interface. Of particular mention is the spontaneous reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) at a solid−liquid interface without the need of any extraneous reducing agent, unlike in the liquidphase reaction whereby no reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have recently discovered spontaneous reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) at solid−liquid interface−interfacial reduction reaction (IRR), which successfully led to fabrication of a high-quality thin film of pristine Cu(I)-TCNQ on a functionalized Au substrate by LbL involving ethanolic solutions of Cu II (OAc) 2 and TCNQ. 28 IRR was consistently observed during LbL growth involving ethanolic solutions of Cu II (OAc) 2 and (K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ]) leading to successful fabrication of a high-quality thin film of Cu(I)−hexacyanoferrate. 27 Thus, in course of the growth of Cu(I)-TCNQ thin film on top of Cu(II)-BTC thin film, at every immersion step of LbL into TCNQ solution, Cu(II) was getting converted into Cu(I) by IRR, which finally resulted in formation of welldefined AB-type heterostructured thin film.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have recently discovered spontaneous reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) at solid−liquid interface−interfacial reduction reaction (IRR), which successfully led to fabrication of a high-quality thin film of pristine Cu(I)-TCNQ on a functionalized Au substrate by LbL involving ethanolic solutions of Cu II (OAc) 2 and TCNQ. 28 IRR was consistently observed during LbL growth involving ethanolic solutions of Cu II (OAc) 2 and (K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ]) leading to successful fabrication of a high-quality thin film of Cu(I)−hexacyanoferrate. 27 Thus, in course of the growth of Cu(I)-TCNQ thin film on top of Cu(II)-BTC thin film, at every immersion step of LbL into TCNQ solution, Cu(II) was getting converted into Cu(I) by IRR, which finally resulted in formation of welldefined AB-type heterostructured thin film.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Pristine and heterostructured thin films of Cu-BTC and Cu-TCNQ on functionalized Au substrates were successfully fabricated by standard protocols established in our group (see the Supporting Information for experimental details and Figure S1). , Our data are consistent with earlier reports on the interfacial growth of pristine Cu-BTC and Cu-TCNQ thin films whereby in each cycle of the LbL growth, multilayers of respective CP were getting deposited at the solid–liquid interface. In the present study, we have changed the ligand to sequentially deposit Cu-TCNQ on top of Cu-BTC and vice versa, thereby leading to generation of AB- and BA-type heterostructured thin films, and thus, it has been conventionally named LbL growth. It is worthwhile to mention that upon dipping the Cu-BTC thin film into a methanolic solution of TCNQ for a prolonged time, complete conversion of Cu-BTC to Cu-TCNQ can take place, and as a result, it remained really difficult to grow Cu-TCNQ thin film on top of the Cu-BTC thin film by LbL with a defined interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[34–36] As the potential steps increasing to 0.1 V, there is no observable difference that can be found in the Raman spectra, demonstrating that the electrochemical process only involves the ionic absorption at the lower potential. While at the potential steps of 0.2 V, the Raman spectra feature the signal of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3– at 2135.7 cm –1 (ν 1 , A 1g ), [ 34–35 ] and the signal shows the enhanced trend as the increase of potential, which corresponds to the transformation of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 4– to [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3– . Note that the peak of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3– exhibits the strong intensity even at the discharge potential of 0.5 V, confirming that [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3– ions still distribute in EDL due to the higher Q d arising from the oxides of [Fe(CN) 6 ] 4– ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%