2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspective on the geometric conservation law and finite element methods for ALE simulations of incompressible flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it may not be true in discretized forms because of numerical errors. Even when low-order schemes are used,Étienne et al [86] showed that a numerical method satisfying the VCL will generally allow a much larger computational time step than its counterpart violating the VCL. To ensure the VCL, the volume conservation item is usually applied to calculate the time derivative of Jacobian following…”
Section: Geometric Conservative Law and The Conservative Metric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it may not be true in discretized forms because of numerical errors. Even when low-order schemes are used,Étienne et al [86] showed that a numerical method satisfying the VCL will generally allow a much larger computational time step than its counterpart violating the VCL. To ensure the VCL, the volume conservation item is usually applied to calculate the time derivative of Jacobian following…”
Section: Geometric Conservative Law and The Conservative Metric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by many authors [78,86]. The errors in I x , I y and I z are usually related to grid quality, such as smoothness, uniformity, orthogonality, and stretch rate.…”
Section: Geometric Conservative Law and The Conservative Metric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has also been applied with finite differences [135], conforming finite elements [24,56,58], discontinuous Galerkin methods [114] (space-time FE and DG methods automatically satisfy the GCL [141]), and residual distribution schemes [99]. The paper ofÉtienne, Garon and Pelletier [56] includes a useful summary of the literature in this area and highlights three increasingly challenging levels of compliance with the GCL within a formulation of a moving mesh algorithm.…”
Section: The Gcl Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A desvantagem desta forma é que ela depende da escolha da discretização temporal e da velocidade da malha para que a GCL seja satisfeita. Mais especificamente, um esquema satisfaz a GCL, se a relação Outra forma de satisfazer a GCL na forma conservativa, apresentada em Étienne et al [22], é, em vez de usar a velocidade da malha para calcular o termo ∇ · v h (i.e., calcular explicitamente o divergente da velocidade da malha discretizada v h ), troca-se tal termo por outro usando a bem conhecida relação da mecânica do contínuo (ver, e.g., [41]) …”
Section: Discretização Temporalunclassified
“…Em todos os casos, foi obtida a solução exata (dentro da precisão de máquina), diferentemente do que é reportado em Étienne et al [22] (também para um escoamente de Couette), que obteve apenas convergência linear para o CN na mesma formulação adotada neste trabalho (formulação não conservativa), mas que também obteve solução exata com a formulação conservativa.…”
Section: Convergência Em Malha Dinâmica -Iunclassified