Perspective on the Future Approaches to Predict Retention in Liquid Chromatography

Abstract

The demand for rapid column screening, computer-assisted method development and method transfer, and unambiguous compound identification by LC/MS analyses has pushed analysts to adopt experimental protocols and software for the accurate prediction of the retention time in liquid chromatography (LC). This Perspective discusses the classical approaches used to predict retention times in LC over the last three decades and proposes future requirements to increase their accuracy. First, inverse methods for retention prediction are essentially applied during screening and gradient method optimization: a minimum number of experiments or design of experiments (DoE) is run to train and calibrate a model (either purely statistical or based on the principles and fundamentals of liquid chromatography) by a mere fitting process. They do not require the accurate knowledge of the true column hold-up volume V 0, system dwell volume V dwell (in gradient elution), and the retention behavior (k versus the content of strong solvent φ, temperature T, pH, and ionic strength I) of the analytes. Their relative accuracy is often excellent below a few percent. Statistical methods are expected to be the most attractive to handle very complex retention behavior such as in mixed-mode chromatography (MMC). Fundamentally correct retention models accounting for the simultaneous impact of φ, I, pH, and T in MMC are needed for method development based on chromatography principles. Second, direct methods for retention prediction are ideally suited for accurate method transfer from one column/system configuration to another: these quality by design (QbD) methods are based on the fundamentals and principles of solid–liquid adsorption and gradient chromatography. No model calibration is necessary; however, they require universal conventions for the accurate determination of true retention factors (for 1 < k < 30) as a function of the experimental variables (φ, T, pH, and I) and of the true column/system parameters (V 0, V dwell, dispersion volume, σ, and relaxation volume, τ, of the programmed gradient profile at the column inlet and gradient distortion at the column outlet). Finally, when the molecular structure of the analytes is either known or assumed, retention prediction has essentially been made on the basis of statistical approaches such as the linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs) and the quantitative structure retention relationships (QSRRs): their ability to accurately predict the retention remains limited within 10–30%. They have been combined with molecular similarity approaches (where the retention model is calibrated with compounds having structures similar to that of the targeted analytes) and artificial intelligence algorithms to further improve their accuracy below 10%. In this Perspective, it is proposed to adopt a more rigorous and fundamental approach by considering the very details of the solid–liquid adsorption process: Monte Carlo (MC) or molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are promising tools to explain and interpret ...

Full Collision Energy Ramp-MS2 Spectrum in Structural Analysis Relying on MS/MS

“…Consequently, more orthogonal structural clues are demanded to further advance "spectrum-to-structure" analysis, such as the collision cross-sectional value from ion mobility-MS 33 and quantitative structure−retention time relationship modeling on a chromatographic platform. 34…”

A new strategy for the computer-assisted development of reversed-phase liquid chromatography separation methods of unknown sample mixtures

“…For partially unknown mixtures, the number of columns to be tested can be reduced considerably. The use of available tools that use the chemical and structural properties of the known mixture components allows reducing significantly the screening experimental work and selecting the more promising column and solvent selectivities [ 7 ]. On the other side, the objective in the experimental design is twofold.…”

“…The obtained chromatograms are processed to assign the retention of each component in each run. The obtained retention times are processed to build the retention model using any of the theoretical models available [ 7 ]. The so-called linear solvent strength model (LSSM) [ 8 ] is widely used for these purposes.…”

An atomistic view on the uptake of aromatic compounds by cyclodextrin immobilized on mesoporous silica

“…An atomistic simulation study of enantiomeric separation of (R)-and (S)-ibuprofen in methanol solvent by means of immobilized cyclodextrins in a slit shaped model pore was reported recently [32]. Therefore, molecular simulation has evolved toward a promising tool to study liquid phase separation processes that are too complex to be described by phenomenological models [33].…”