2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0119840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspective on muon-spin rotation/relaxation under hydrostatic pressure

Abstract: Pressure, together with temperature, electric, and magnetic fields, alters the system and allows for the investigation of the fundamental properties of matter. Under applied pressure, the interatomic distances shrink, which modifies the interactions between atoms and may lead to the appearance of new (sometimes exotic) physical properties, such as pressure-induced phase transitions; quantum critical points; new structural, magnetic, and/or superconducting states; and changes of the temperature evolution and sy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 Experiments under the quasi-hydrostatic pressure conditions were conducted at the µE1 beamline using the GPD spectrometer. 43,44 A pressure up to ≃ 2.3 GPa was generated in a double-walled clamp type cell made of nonmagnetic MP35N alloy. 43 As a pressure transmitting medium, Daphne 7373 oil was used.…”
Section: B µSr Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Experiments under the quasi-hydrostatic pressure conditions were conducted at the µE1 beamline using the GPD spectrometer. 43,44 A pressure up to ≃ 2.3 GPa was generated in a double-walled clamp type cell made of nonmagnetic MP35N alloy. 43 As a pressure transmitting medium, Daphne 7373 oil was used.…”
Section: B µSr Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the experiment [1,3,25] remains the final criterion. Therefore, the confirmation of the predicted T c in order to determine the other fundamental ground-state parameters, including the upper critical field, B c2 (0); the lower critical field, B c1 (0) [12,22]; the self-field critical current density, J c (s f , T) [24,[82][83][84]; the London penetration depth, λ(0) [22,23,85,86]; the superconducting energy gap amplitude, ∆(0) [87][88][89]; and gap symmetry [90,91]; is the task of the experiment and the data analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, the experiment [1,3,25] remains the final criterion. Therefore, the confirmation of the predicted T c in order to determine the other fundamental ground-state parameters, including the upper critical field, B c2 (0); the lower critical field, B c1 (0) [12,22]; the self-field critical current density, J c (s f , T) [24,[82][83][84]; the London penetration depth, λ(0) [22,23,85,86]; the superconducting energy gap amplitude, ∆(0) [87][88][89]; and gap symmetry [90,91]; is the task of the experiment and the data analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%