2023
DOI: 10.1177/26349795231191023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectival Kinaesthetic Imaging

Lambros Malafouris,
Rory Carnegie,
Miranda Creswell
et al.

Abstract: Perspectival Kinaesthetic Imaging is being proposed as a method designed to facilitate the heightened sensitivity needed for the anthropological study of the relationship between making and thinking, during the creative engagement with form-generating materials. Technically, this objective is achieved through the juxtaposition of perspectival view points on the process of making. We follow the ways of the hand using a combination of multimodal visual captures (i.e., photography, video, observational drawing an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing traction gained by 5E perspectives in recent years has significantly advanced our understanding of how materiality shapes human development, fostering new opportunities for (inter)action across multiple timescales and social contexts. This progress is exemplified by contributions stemming or gaining insights from frameworks such as Material Engagement Theory (e.g., Alessandroni & Malafouris, 2023;Barona, 2021;Gallagher & Ransom, 2016;Gubenko & Houssemand, 2022;Malafouris, 2013;Malafouris et al, 2023;March & Malafouris, 2023;Paolucci, 2021;Vietri et al, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing traction gained by 5E perspectives in recent years has significantly advanced our understanding of how materiality shapes human development, fostering new opportunities for (inter)action across multiple timescales and social contexts. This progress is exemplified by contributions stemming or gaining insights from frameworks such as Material Engagement Theory (e.g., Alessandroni & Malafouris, 2023;Barona, 2021;Gallagher & Ransom, 2016;Gubenko & Houssemand, 2022;Malafouris, 2013;Malafouris et al, 2023;March & Malafouris, 2023;Paolucci, 2021;Vietri et al, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%