Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop212007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personnel Selection and Employee Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 355 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, "cognitive ability is widely considered to be the single best predictor of learning and performance, especially on difficult and complex tasks" (Bell & Kozlowski, 2002, p. 497). However, as workplaces become more uncertain (Burke, Pierce, & Salas, 2006;Pulakos, Arad, Donovan, & Plamondon, 2000), traditional means of defining and evaluating employee performance may no longer be valid (Cortina & Luchman, 2013). This has led scholars to explore the extent to which GMA is still relevant for predicting performance as the criterion domain has continued to expand.…”
Section: General Mental Ability and Goal Type As Antecedents Of Recurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, "cognitive ability is widely considered to be the single best predictor of learning and performance, especially on difficult and complex tasks" (Bell & Kozlowski, 2002, p. 497). However, as workplaces become more uncertain (Burke, Pierce, & Salas, 2006;Pulakos, Arad, Donovan, & Plamondon, 2000), traditional means of defining and evaluating employee performance may no longer be valid (Cortina & Luchman, 2013). This has led scholars to explore the extent to which GMA is still relevant for predicting performance as the criterion domain has continued to expand.…”
Section: General Mental Ability and Goal Type As Antecedents Of Recurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure represents the standard, static, linear causal model of job performance (Campbell & Pritchard, ; Cortina & Luchman, ). It is from this model that we build several dynamic, computational variants.…”
Section: Developing a Dynamic Computational Model Of Job Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we developed a computational model of the field's general model of job performance (e.g., Campbell & Pritchard, ; Cortina & Luchman, ) to examine possible sources of skewness in performance distributions. That is, we translate the general model (see Figure ), which is static and linear in terms of causality, into one that can represent cumulating effects, change over time, and feedback processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biografski pristup upravljanju ljudskim resursima pokazao se kao jedan od boljih prediktora ponašanja budućih zaposlenih (Schmitt, & Golubovich, 2013). Ipak, ovaj metod odabira kadrova većina organizacija ne primenjuje, čak ni na formalan način, a poslednjih godina ova tema izaziva sve manje pažnje istraživača (Cortina, & Luchman, 2013).…”
Section: Zaključakunclassified