Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.5200/1822-9530.2012.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalo / žmogiškųjų išteklių padalinių įtaka Lietuvos įmonių veiklai

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AmalouDo¨pke and Su¨ß (2014) established that personnel managers, managing human resources, are using information about them as an instrument for their powers in exchange for recognition. And perhaps due to insufficient status and recognition, personnel managers do not manage to take a strategic decision (Stankevičienė and Šarupičiūtė, 2014;Česynienė and Stankevičienė, 2012). Yet the experience that was shared by research participants witnesses that on the level of a group or individual they still manage to control the inflicting even though for a long time lasting conflicts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AmalouDo¨pke and Su¨ß (2014) established that personnel managers, managing human resources, are using information about them as an instrument for their powers in exchange for recognition. And perhaps due to insufficient status and recognition, personnel managers do not manage to take a strategic decision (Stankevičienė and Šarupičiūtė, 2014;Česynienė and Stankevičienė, 2012). Yet the experience that was shared by research participants witnesses that on the level of a group or individual they still manage to control the inflicting even though for a long time lasting conflicts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we state that the position of a personnel manager within a company is a strategist rather than a tactician or administrator taking care of recruitment or firing. However, to reveal the status of Human Resource (HR) divisions in Lithuanian companies Česynienė and Stankevičienė (2012) carried out an opinion poll of HR managers and specialists in 92 companies of Lithuania. The study revealed that "insufficient participation of the personnel/ human resource management division in the processes of company work strategy preparation and decision making shows that the role of the division has not experienced any significant transformations, it remained more serving than strategic as compared to other divisions creating value added" (Česynienė and Stankevičienė, 2012, p. 449).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research pursued wider objectives than those covered in the present article. The study covered such acute human resource management issues as the status of the human resource department, its role in the strategy building process and the participation in making other important decisions (Česynienė, Stankevičienė, 2012). The research also aimed at finding out whether it is possible to elucidate changes in the priorities of the functions performed by human resources departments, as well as in the competences of human resource specialists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the situation is used both to humiliate an employee and to pursue the objectives of the organization (in violation of the rights of the employee) by giving additional work and thereby reducing costs that would be required to hire additional staff. In this context, the statement of the informant I3 that the manager said «... if you don't like it, you can quit...», may be associated with the pressure to resign, and with the prevailing business culture in Lithuania, where the human resources of the organization are not valued and developed adequately to the concept formed by the management science (Veinhardt and Kotovskiene, 2008;Baksyte and Stripeikis, 2011;Cesyniene and StankeviCiene, 2012). That is, there are features of abuse when forced to do the work, which is not paid extra, and using psychological pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%