2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized striatal targets for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients in all cohorts were of similar age with a similar Y-BOCS score at baseline and comparable Y-BOCS improvement scores (Table 1). In the first test cohort (Madrid; NAcc target; N = 8), improvement scores were taken after activating each of the four electrode contact pairs for 3 months, respectively (following the clinical protocol as described in 39 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients in all cohorts were of similar age with a similar Y-BOCS score at baseline and comparable Y-BOCS improvement scores (Table 1). In the first test cohort (Madrid; NAcc target; N = 8), improvement scores were taken after activating each of the four electrode contact pairs for 3 months, respectively (following the clinical protocol as described in 39 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every trial reported lower mean Y-BOCS severity in the on condition relative to the off condition as assessed immediately following the stimulation period, though this difference only reached statistical significance in three of the six studies that employed significance testing (one study did not use significance testing due to a sample size of 4 patients [23]). Although three of these trials did not demonstrate statistically significant superiority of active vs. sham DBS, they all showed lower Y-BOCS scores in the active groups, and significant declines in Y-BOCS scores during the open phases of the trial (see 'Long term clinical significance' section) [24,26,27]. The three studies with relatively larger sample sizes (ns = 14-17) showed significant differences between sham and active DBS settings (differences in average post-DBS Y-BOCS scores of 8, 9, and 11 points) [13,14,25].…”
Section: Efficacy Compared With Sham Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main outcome, OCD severity, was assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) [22] in every trial. Six trials followed a randomized crossover design, with patients randomly assigned to 'on-off' or 'off-on' sequences of stimulation [13,14,[23][24][25][26]. One trial used a staggered-onset design [27].…”
Section: Efficacy Compared With Sham Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study examined a personalized technique for DBS targeting in OCD . A prospective, randomized, double‐blinded study was conducted of 7 patients who underwent bilateral DBS of the striatum to strategically reach projections from the PFC.…”
Section: Obsessive‐compulsive Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%