Personalized setting of plan parameters using feasibility dose volume histogram for auto‐planning in Pinnacle system

Abstract

Purpose The personalized setting of plan parameters in the Auto‐Planning module of the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) using the PlanIQ feasibility tool was evaluated for lung cancer conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). Materials and method We reviewed the records of ten patients with lung cancer who were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Three plans were designed for each patient: the clinically accepted manual plan (MP) and two automatic plans including one generated using the generic plan parameters in technique script (AP1) and the other generated using personalized plan parameters derived based on feasibility dose volume histogram (FDVH) in PlanIQ (AP2). The plans were assessed according to the dosimetric parameters, monitor units, and planning time. A plan quality metric (PQM) was defined according to the clinical requirements for plan assessment. Results AP2 achieved better lung sparing than AP1 and MP. The PQM value of AP2 (52.5 ± 14.3) was higher than those of AP1 (49.2 ± 16.2) and MP (44.8 ± 16.9) with P < 0.05. The monitor units of AP2 (585.9 ± 142.9 MU) was higher than that of AP1 (511.1 ± 136.5 MU) and lower than that of MP (632.8 ± 143.8 MU) with p < 0.05. The planning time of AP2 (33.2 ± 4.8 min) was slightly higher than that of AP1 (28.2 ± 4.0 min) and substantially lower than that of MP (72.9 ± 28.5 min) with P < 0.05. Conclusions The Auto‐Planning module of the Pinnacle system using personalized plan parameters suggested by the PlanIQ Feasibility tool provides superior quality for lung cancer plans, especially in terms of lung sparing. The time consumption of Auto‐Planning was slightly higher with the personalized parameters compared to that with the generic parameters, but significantly lower than that for the manual plan.

Evaluation of Auto-Planning for Left-Side Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery Based on Geometrical Relationship

“…For example, the modification of the restriction conditions in the template and the parameter setting of hot and cold spots will affect the result of the APs. (23,24) In addition, the limited number of patients in this study is slightly lower. The result can be more convincing with a larger sample size and more different type of diseases as the research object.…”

Evaluation of Auto-Planning for Left-Side Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery Based on Geometrical Relationship

“…Secondly, although the optimization process of AP reduces the interference of human subjective factors, there are certain subjective factors in the initial settings of AP. For example, the modification of the restriction conditions in the template and the parameter setting of hot and cold spots will affect the result of the APs (23,24). In addition, the number of patients enrolled in this study is limited.…”

Analysis of prostate intensity‐ and volumetric‐modulated arc radiation therapy planning quality with PlanIQTM

“…“Impossible DVH (red)” is defined as the DVH generated using the minimum dose that an off‐target voxel must receive given 100% target coverage. Studies that used the PlanIQ TM software have reported improvements in the treatment plan quality 8–13 . Recently, PlanIQ TM was integrated into Autoplan®, which is implemented in Pinnacle and has been clinically applied 9,10 .…”