Personalized Prescription Feedback Using Routinely Collected Data to Reduce Antibiotic Use in Primary Care

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Feedback interventions using routinely collected health data might reduce antibiotic use nationwide without requiring the substantial resources and structural efforts of other antibiotic stewardship programs. OBJECTIVE To determine if quarterly antibiotic prescription feedback over 2 years reduces antibiotic use when implemented in a complex health care system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Pragmatic randomized trial using routinely collected claims data on 2900 primary care physicians with the highest antibiotic prescription rates in Switzerland. INTERVENTIONS Physicians were randomized to quarterly updated personalized antibiotic prescription feedback over 2 years (n = 1450) or usual care (n = 1450). Feedback was provided both by mail and online from October 2013 to October 2015 and was supported by an initial 1-time provision of evidence-based guidelines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the prescribed defined daily doses (DDD) of any antibiotic to any patient per 100 consultations in the first year analyzed by intention-to-treat. We further analyzed prescriptions of specific antibiotics, age groups, and sex for the first and second year to investigate persistency of effects over time. RESULTS The 2900 physicians had 10 660 124 consultations over 2 years of follow-up, prescribed 1 175 780 packages of antibiotics with 10 290 182 DDD. Physicians receiving feedback prescribed the same amount of antibiotics to all patients in the first year (between-group difference, 0.81%; 95% CI, −2.56% to 4.30%; P = .64) and second year (between-group difference, −1.73%; 95% CI, −5.07% to 1.72%; P = .32) compared with the control group. Prescribing to children aged 6 to 18 years was −8.61% lower in the feedback than in the control group in the first year (95% CI, −14.87% to −1.90%; P = .01). This difference diminished in the second year (between-group difference, −4.10%; 95% CI, −10.78% to 3.07%; P = .25). Physicians receiving feedback prescribed fewer antibiotics to adults aged 19 to 65 years in the second year (between-group difference, −4.59%; 95% CI, −7.91% to −1.16%; P < .01). Prescribing to other patient groups or of specific antibiotic types was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This nationwide antibiotic stewardship program with routine feedback on antibiotic prescribing was not associated with a change of antibiotic use. In older children, adolescents, and younger adults less antibiotics were prescribed, but not consistently over the entire intervention period. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01773824

Effect of prescriber peer comparison reports on fluoroquinolone use across a 16‐facility community hospital system

“…Our study results were contradictory to a Swiss study that did not show any differences in outpatient antibiotic utilization after provision of prescriber peer comparison reports . However, there are significant differences between their study and the current study.…”

Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of an antimicrobial stewardship program in primary care: A qualitative study

“…[21] While such beliefs may serve as a barrier to community ASP efforts, individual data may potentially affect engagement of providers unless the credibility of the reports can be assured. [21] Additionally, while an American study of primary care doctors found an important 5% absolute reduction in antibiotic prescribing with individualized peer comparison [47], a large European study found no effect [48]. Standardized coding of the clinical indication for prescribing an antibiotic has been suggested as a way to improve audit data quality in primary care.…”

An Assessment of Potential Unintended Consequences Following a National Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in England: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

“…Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious public health problem threatening to undermine modern medicine [1]. Prescribing and consumption of antibiotics is a key driver of resistance and there have been a number of antimicrobial stewardship programs (pay-for-performance, educational, audits, and guidelines) implemented in different countries with the intention of reducing inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”